ArticleGlobal bioethics = Problemi di bioetica2025
Perspectives of stakeholders on post-trial access arrangements in Ethiopia: a qualitative study.
Article in Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While there is limited practical experience and guidance on post-trial access (PTA) in clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries, the concept of benefit-sharing is firmly established in international ethical guidelines. Few studies have been conducted in sub-Saharan African on PTA despite its importance in distributive justice. This study aims to explore the stakeholders' perspectives on PTA and its feasibility in Ethiopia. An exploratory qualitative study using in-depth interviews was conducted with 22 stakeholders involved in clinical trials study and review. Deductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. We found that research participants had limited knowledge on PTA. They opined that both trial participants and communities should benefit from clinical trials and multi-stakeholder collaboration was key in PTA planning and arrangements. However, they were uncertain of PTA feasibility in Ethiopia mostly due to a lack of legislation, regulations and guidelines on PTA and fear of losing sponsors because of increased costs resulting from them being obligated to provide PTA. It was recommended that Ethiopia establishes legislation and guidelines to govern PTA. Multi-stakeholder engagement in PTA planning and arrangements is key for meaningful PTA as the responsibility is shouldered by all parties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.