Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329952›Full record

ArticleCase reports in anesthesiology2025

Should Spinal Anesthesia Be Used for Spine Surgery: A Case Report.

Gabrielle A White-Dzuro, Xiaodong Bao, Francis McGovern, Robert A Peterfreund

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabrielle A White-DzuroDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4090-009X
Xiaodong BaoDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4966-3580
Francis McGovernDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8134-4952
Robert A PeterfreundDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-5014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A patient with lumbar spine stenosis presented for lumbar spine decompression, clearly stating a preference for spinal anesthesia (SA) over general anesthesia (GA). Surgery was performed under uneventful SA without sedation. The patient recovered from surgery quickly and without incident, requiring no postoperative opioid analgesia. What data support administering SA for lumbar spine surgery? A literature search found nine recently published reviews favoring SA over GA. These reviews cited many of the same, older, flawed, primary research reports. Although choosing SA was reasonable, our literature analysis suggests blind reliance on summary conclusions of reviews and meta-analyses may be misleading.

Indexed as

lumbar spine surgeryspinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40329952
PMCPMC12052442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.