ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Adherence to treatment for tuberculosis infection in children using a comprehensive care strategy: a prospective cohort study with a historical control group.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04331262 (Tuberculosis en Niños), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Tuberculosis en Niños: Implementación de Una Estrategia de Cuidado Integral Para Los Niños Contacto de Pacientes Con Tuberculosis Pulmonar Bacilífera
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of the available preventive tuberculosis treatment regimens for children and adolescents: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Pooled it
- Shorter Antitubercular Regimens Versus 9 Months of Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Pooled it
- Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in people living with HIV: Clinical issues, therapeutic challenges and perspectives in sub-Saharan Africa. A narrative review.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low adherence to treatment for tuberculosis infection (TBI) in children threatens tuberculosis (TB) control goals. This research focuses on children with close contact to TB and TBI. This study evaluated adherence to treatment of TBI using a comprehensive care strategy (CCS) for close-contact children with pulmonary TB compared with standard of care (SOC). Methods: A prospective cohort study with a historical control group was conducted on children under five, who were close contacts of patients with bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB in three Colombian cities (study registration number: NCT04331262). The CCS comprised clinical evaluations, rifampicin for four months, multidisciplinary care, and logistical support, while the SOC followed program regulations with isoniazid for nine months. The primary outcome was the proportion of children completing 100% treatment during follow-up, and the secondary outcome was treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Findings: 213 children in the SOC group and 86 children in the CCS group were analyzed. The treatment adherence in the SOC group was 40·8% (95% CI 34%; 48%), while in the CCS group it was 76·7% (95% CI 66%; 85%). Children exposed to CCS had 87% higher probability of adherence to TBI treatment compared to SOC (RR 1·87; 95% CI 1·52; 2·31). The incidence of AEs was lower in the CCS group (n = 3) than in those receiving SOC (n = 24). Interpretation: The CCS increases adherence to treatment for TBI in children safely compared to SOC. Future cost-effectiveness studies will help implement this strategy in programmatic settings. Funding: Colombian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.