ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Choosing the right treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Unilateral open-door laminoplasty alone with and without foraminoplasty for the treatment of mixed cervical spondylosis.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2026Article
- Predictive value of preoperative T1 slope minus cervical lordosis for clinical outcomes after standalone laminectomy in elderly degenerative cervical myelopathy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Infrared thermography as adjunctive imaging in spine surgery: Evaluating thermal asymmetry for predicting symptomatic level and recovery.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Quantitative MRI Signal Changes of the Spinal Cord as Predictors of Suboptimal Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cost and Patient-Centered Outcomes in the United States.Global spine journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive degenerative disorder of the spinal cord that can lead to significant and irreversible neurological deficits if left untreated. Determining the most appropriate treatment strategy requires a thorough assessment of disease severity, patient-specific factors, and comparative benefits of surgical versus non-surgical interventions. Conservative treatment, including physical therapy, pharmacological treatment, and lifestyle modifications, might be considered for patients with mild symptoms and those deemed unsuitable for surgery. However, for cases with moderate to severe myelopathy or progressive neurological deterioration, surgical treatment remains the gold standard. Surgical options-including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), laminoplasty, and laminectomy with or without fusion-should be selected based on the pattern of spinal cord compression, sagittal alignment, and patient comorbidities. ACDF and ACCF are preferred for focal anterior compression at limited levels, whereas laminoplasty is generally indicated for multilevel posterior compression in patients with preserved cervical lordosis. For cases with cervical kyphosis or significant instability, laminectomy with fusion is often required. In certain complex cases, a combined anterior-posterior approach may be necessary to achieve adequate decompression, restore spinal alignment, and enhance stability, particularly in patients with severe deformities or multilevel involvement. Recent advances in minimally invasive spine surgery and motion-preserving techniques, such as cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), have broadened the spectrum of treatment options, offering potential benefits for reducing perioperative morbidity and preserving segmental motion. Additionally, acute spinal cord injury due to trauma in a spondylotic spine, particularly central cord syndrome (CCS), represents a critical consideration in treatment planning. The role of anterior versus posterior surgery, including the rationale for decision-making, has been expanded to highlight key factors such as sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, and spinal alignment. Moreover, we discuss the role of laminectomy without fusion in DCM management, evaluating its indications and limitations. Decision-making must carefully weigh patient-reported outcomes, complication risks, and long-term functional prognosis. This review provides an expert synthesis of current evidence and guidelines for DCM treatment, integrating the latest surgical innovations and a patient-centered approach to optimize clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.