Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329935›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Choosing the right treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Jong-Beom Park, Gun Woo Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jong-Beom ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, 271 Cheonbo-ro, Uijeongbu-si, Gyeonggi-do, 11765, Republic of Korea.
Gun Woo LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, 170 Hyonchung-ro, Namgu, Daegu, 42415, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive degenerative disorder of the spinal cord that can lead to significant and irreversible neurological deficits if left untreated. Determining the most appropriate treatment strategy requires a thorough assessment of disease severity, patient-specific factors, and comparative benefits of surgical versus non-surgical interventions. Conservative treatment, including physical therapy, pharmacological treatment, and lifestyle modifications, might be considered for patients with mild symptoms and those deemed unsuitable for surgery. However, for cases with moderate to severe myelopathy or progressive neurological deterioration, surgical treatment remains the gold standard. Surgical options-including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), laminoplasty, and laminectomy with or without fusion-should be selected based on the pattern of spinal cord compression, sagittal alignment, and patient comorbidities. ACDF and ACCF are preferred for focal anterior compression at limited levels, whereas laminoplasty is generally indicated for multilevel posterior compression in patients with preserved cervical lordosis. For cases with cervical kyphosis or significant instability, laminectomy with fusion is often required. In certain complex cases, a combined anterior-posterior approach may be necessary to achieve adequate decompression, restore spinal alignment, and enhance stability, particularly in patients with severe deformities or multilevel involvement. Recent advances in minimally invasive spine surgery and motion-preserving techniques, such as cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), have broadened the spectrum of treatment options, offering potential benefits for reducing perioperative morbidity and preserving segmental motion. Additionally, acute spinal cord injury due to trauma in a spondylotic spine, particularly central cord syndrome (CCS), represents a critical consideration in treatment planning. The role of anterior versus posterior surgery, including the rationale for decision-making, has been expanded to highlight key factors such as sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, and spinal alignment. Moreover, we discuss the role of laminectomy without fusion in DCM management, evaluating its indications and limitations. Decision-making must carefully weigh patient-reported outcomes, complication risks, and long-term functional prognosis. This review provides an expert synthesis of current evidence and guidelines for DCM treatment, integrating the latest surgical innovations and a patient-centered approach to optimize clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Central cord syndromeConservative treatmentDegenerative cervical myelopathySurgical decision-makingSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID40329935
PMCPMC12049995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.