Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329861›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Advancing promiscuous aggregating inhibitor analysis with intelligent machine learning classification.

Luxuan Wang, Beihong Ji, Jingchen Zhai, Junmei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luxuan WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
Beihong JiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
Jingchen ZhaiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2691-8867
Junmei WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-8229

Funding

New Generation of General AMBER Force Field for Biomedical ResearchR01GM147673 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WANG, JUNMEI, YANG, WEI · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
AI-Powered Biased Ligand DesignR01GM149705 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Junmei Wang · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM147673NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM149705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small molecules have been playing a crucial role in drug discovery; however, some exhibit nonspecific inhibitory effects during hit screening due to the formation of colloidal aggregators. Such false positives often lead to significant research costs and time investment. Therefore, to identify potential aggregating compounds efficiently and accurately at an early stage of drug discovery, we employed several machine learning techniques to develop classification models for identifying promiscuous aggregating inhibitors. Using a training dataset of 10 000 aggregators and 10 000 nonaggregators, models were trained by combining four different molecular representations with various machine learning algorithms. We found that the best-performing model is the one that employs path-based FP2 fingerprints in conjunction with the cubic support vector machine algorithm, which achieved the highest accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for both the validation and test datasets while maintaining high sensitivity and specificity levels (>0.93). Additionally, we have proposed a new model interpretation method, global sensitivity analysis (GSA), to complement the well-recognized SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis. Several comparative studies have shown that GSA is a time-efficient and accurate approach for identifying crucial descriptors that contribute to model prediction, especially in the scenario where the dataset contains a substantial number of data entries with a limited set of descriptors. Our models as well as GSA findings can provide useful guidance on screening library design to minimize false positives.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansROC CurveSupport Vector Machinecolloidal aggregatorcompound library designdrug screeningglobal sensitivity analysismachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40329861
PMCPMC12056367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.