Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329698›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Decision Trees for Managing Impaired Physical Mobility in Multiple Trauma Patients.

Raisa Camilo Ferreira, Karen Dunn-Lopez, Sue Moorhead, Anna Krupp, Bruna Valentina Zuchatti, Luciana Aparecida Costa Carvalho, Micneias Tatiana de Souza Lacerda Botelho, Erika Christiane Marocco Duran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raisa Camilo FerreiraSchool of Nursing, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-8143
Karen Dunn-LopezCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9700-941X
Sue MoorheadCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-9909
Anna KruppCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-9441
Bruna Valentina ZuchattiSchool of Nursing, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9288-3394
Luciana Aparecida Costa CarvalhoSchool of Nursing, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-991X
Micneias Tatiana de Souza Lacerda BotelhoSchool of Nursing, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Sinop, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-9603
Erika Christiane Marocco DuranSchool of Nursing, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9112-752X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop and validate decision trees using conditional probabilities to identify the predictors of mortality and morbidity deterioration in trauma patients.

designA quasi-experimental longitudinal study conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center in São Paulo, Brazil.

methodThe study analysed 201 patient records using standardised nursing documentation (NANDA International and Nursing Outcomes Classification). Decision trees were constructed using the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm and validated through K-fold cross-validation to ensure model reliability.

resultsDecision trees identified key predictors of survival and mobility deterioration. Patients who did not require (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status but required (NOC 0210) Transfer Performance had a 97.4% survival rate. Conversely, those requiring (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status had a 25% risk of worsening mobility, compared to 9% for those who did not. K-fold cross-validation confirmed the model's predictive accuracy, reinforcing the robustness of the decision tree approach (Value).

conclusionDecision trees demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for mobility outcomes and mortality risk, offering a structured, data-driven framework for clinical decision-making. These findings underscore the importance of early mobilisation, tailored rehabilitation interventions and assistive devices in improving patient recovery. This study is among the first to apply decision trees in this context, highlighting its novelty and potential to enhance trauma critical care practices. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: This study highlights the potential of decision trees, a supervised machine learning method, in nursing practice by providing clear, evidence-based guidance for clinical decision-making. By enabling early identification of high-risk patients, decision trees facilitate timely interventions, reduce complications and support personalised rehabilitation strategies that enhance patient safety and recovery. IMPACT: This research addresses the challenge of improving outcomes for critically ill and trauma patients with impaired mobility by identifying effective strategies for early mobilisation and rehabilitation. The integration of artificial intelligence-driven decision trees strengthens evidence-based nursing practice, enhances patient education and informs scalable interventions that reduce trauma-related complications. These findings have implications for healthcare providers, rehabilitation specialists and policymakers seeking to optimise trauma care and improve long-term patient outcomes. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients provided authorisation for the collection of their clinical data from medical records during hospitalisation.

Indexed as

Decision TreesMobility LimitationMultiple TraumaAdultAgedBrazilFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle Agedartificial intelligenceclinical decision‐makingdecision treeselectronic health recordsmultiple traumastandardised nursing terminology

Identifiers

PMID40329698
PMCPMC12810594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.