Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329653›Full record

ArticleEcology2025

Differential effects of nutrients and consumer pressure on sympatric cryptic coral species (Pocillopora spp.).

Scott C Burgess, Kelly E Speare, Rowan H McLachlan, Erika C Johnston, Thomas C Adam, Rebecca Vega Thurber, Deron E Burkepile

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Genetic Method for Distinguishing CrypticEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Scott C BurgessDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0348-3453
Kelly E SpeareDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-3606
Rowan H McLachlanDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7222-8210
Erika C JohnstonDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0520-9324
Thomas C AdamMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6146-0260
Rebecca Vega ThurberDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-2061
Deron E BurkepileDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-0484

Funding

Directorate for Geosciences OCE-1637396Directorate for Geosciences OCE 1829867Directorate for Geosciences OCE-2023424Directorate for Geosciences OCE-2023701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptic species (evolutionarily distinct lineages that do not align with morphologically defined species) are being increasingly discovered but are poorly integrated into ecological theory. In particular, we still lack a useful understanding of if and how cryptic species differ in ways that affect community recovery from disturbances and responses to anthropogenic stressors, such as the removal of consumers and pollution from nutrients. On coral reefs, nutrient pollution increases the growth of macroalgae that displace corals. Reductions in herbivorous fishes reduce the suppression of macroalgae, while reductions in coralivorous fishes reduce predation on corals. An unresolved question is if and how cryptic coral species respond differently to these impacts, thereby differing in their ability to influence coral community dynamics and maintain coral dominance. Therefore, we assessed how the response of cryptic Pocillopora species over a period of three years following a simulated disturbance from a cyclone depended on the experimental reduction of fish consumer pressure and nutrient addition. After three years, five morphologically cryptic, but genetically distinct, Pocillopora species recruited to the reef. However, recruitment was dominated by two species: Pocillopora tuahiniensis (46%) and Pocillopora meandrina (43%). Under ambient conditions, recruitment of P. tuahiniensis and P. meandrina was similar, but experimentally reducing consumer pressure increased recruitment of P. tuahiniensis by up to 73% and reduced recruitment of P. meandrina by up to 49%. In both species, nutrient enrichment increased recruitment and colony growth rates equally, but colonies of P. tuahiniensis grew faster and were up to 25% larger after three years than those of P. meandrina, and growth was unaffected by reduced consumer pressure. Predation by excavating corallivorous fish was higher for P. meandrina than for P. tuahiniensis, especially under nutrient enrichment. In contrast, polyp extension (an indicator of elevated heterotrophic feeding as well as susceptibility and attractiveness to corallivores) was lower for P. meandrina than for P. tuahiniensis, especially under low to medium consumer pressure. Overall, we uncovered ecological differences in the response of morphologically cryptic foundation species to two pervasive stressors on coral reefs. Our results demonstrate how cryptic species respond differently to key anthropogenic stressors, which may contribute to response diversity that can support ecological resilience or increase extinction risk.

Indexed as

AnthozoaCoral ReefsFishesNutrientsAnimalsSpecies SpecificitySympatryNutrientscorallivorycoral reefsherbivoryrecruitmentregime shiftsresilience

Identifiers

PMID40329653
PMCPMC12056465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.