ReviewThe New phytologist2025
Looking back to look ahead: the temporal dimension of conservation seed bank collections.
Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Two decades of resurrection studies: What have we learned about contemporary evolution of plant species?American journal of botany · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wealth of plant material and data is stored globally in conservation seed banks. This material represents not only a repository of plant genetic resources but also an asset for nature-based solutions (NbS), such as ecological restoration and reforestation, and research in plant science. Here, we explore the temporal and spatial dimensions of seed collections and the challenges limiting their use in NbS and research, while highlighting how they could be a source of material for adaptation and evolution studies. However, existing seed lots originally collected for conservation purposes will not be sufficient to support NbS and research on their own. We propose a long-term experimental approach that, together with new targeted collecting programmes, can leverage the temporal dimension of seed collections by carrying out repeated sampling from the same population. At the same time, we stress how these approaches will benefit from new dedicated collections holding seeds from each maternal line separately. By moving towards a bidimensional (space and time) collecting approach, conservation seed banks can go beyond long-term conservation per se and transform their collections into dynamic repositories capable of addressing pressing ecological, evolutionary, and conservation questions and help to understand and shape plant communities of the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.