Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329505›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy

A Systematic Review Comparing Four Transdiagnostic Programmes for School-Age Children.

Giorgio Ghizzoni, Maria Mirandi, Carlo Garofalo, Claudia Mazzeschi, Elisa Delvecchio

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predicting Anxiety in Secondary School Teachers: A Transdiagnostic Approach.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giorgio GhizzoniDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9844-3575
Maria MirandiDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-1534
Carlo GarofaloDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2306-6961
Claudia MazzeschiDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-2009
Elisa DelvecchioDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-5445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transdiagnostic programmes are useful for helping people with internalizing symptoms and comorbid psychopathology. These programmes have as their basic idea that disorders are not separate entities but share common aetiological and maintenance processes. Their use is important with children, who tend to present less differentiated psychopathological manifestations than adults. This systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness of four evidence-based transdiagnostic programmes: FRIENDS, Pyramid Club, Unified Protocol for Children (UP-C) and Super Skills for Life (SSL). Studies from 2018 to 2023 including children between 4 and 14 years of age were examined. Following PRISMA guidelines, 48 studies that met the inclusion criteria were considered. Most of the studies referred to treatment, only a few used the selected transdiagnostic programmes for prevention, most notably FRIENDS and SSL. Very few of the studies reviewed have been randomized controlled trials, limiting the possibility to examine incremental benefits of these programmes over alternative approaches. The findings show that all programmes showed evidence of effectiveness, but UP-C and SSL appear to be the most promising transdiagnostic programmes for the prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression in children as supported by more numerous studies in recent years. Moreover, UP-C and SSL specifically appeared effective in reducing externalizing problems and improving social skills and prosocial behaviour. Although the results presented are promising, they should be regarded as provisional and in need of further support in randomized controlled trials to test the effectiveness of these evidence-based programmes to ensure the psychological well-being of children and thus reduce healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleanxietychildrendepressionexternalizing symptomsinternalizing symptomstransdiagnostic programmes

Identifiers

PMID40329505
PMCPMC12056278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.