ArticleAmerican journal of clinical pathology2025
ASCP explores the cancer biomarker testing navigator as a novel role to improve laboratory operations and workflows: A special report from the ASCP Biomarker Testing Navigator Project Team.
Article in American journal of clinical pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Standardized protocols for reflexing to a multigene panel for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: prevalence and perceived barriers to comprehensive, pathologist-ordered biomarker reflex testing.American journal of clinical pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCancer biomarker testing is a critical element in precision oncology, guiding treatment decisions and improving patient outcomes. However, the complexity and variability of biomarker testing processes present significant challenges for cancer centers, often leading to delays and inefficiencies that can compromise care quality. The American Society for Clinical Pathology explored the concept of a novel laboratory professional role: the cancer biomarker testing navigator (BTN).
methodsThis study explored the feasibility and impact of the BTN role on laboratory operations and workflows through a 3-phase project consisting of a quantitative needs assessment, qualitative focus group discussions, and a short-term feasibility pilot conducted at 2 cancer centers.
resultsThe needs assessment revealed that many laboratories lack dedicated staff for coordinating biomarker testing, leading to operational inefficiencies. The roundtable discussions highlighted common challenges in biomarker testing and identified potential benefits of the BTN role, such as improved communication, better tracking of send-out tests, and enhanced task efficiency. The feasibility pilot demonstrated that BTNs could coordinate multigene next-generation sequencing panels and expedite key steps to ensure optimal preanalytical processes, reduce delays in testing, and smooth operations. The BTN role represents a feasible and beneficial addition to pathology laboratories that addresses key operational challenges in cancer biomarker testing and offers a promising solution to streamline laboratory operations, improve multidisciplinary communication, and enhance patient care coordination.
conclusionsFurther exploration is warranted to refine the BTN role and assess its long-term sustainability in and impact on diverse laboratory settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.