ArticleImmunoHorizons2025
HIV Nef disrupts Lck signaling by inducing aberrant phosphorylation of its substrates.
Article in ImmunoHorizons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hijacking the Host: Post-Translational Modifications as Molecular Switches in HIV Persistence and Immune Evasion.Journal of medical virology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human in vitro studies of HIV Nef on TcR proximal signaling have been controversial and have not provided an integrated picture of its impact. Tyrosine (Y) phosphorylation (pY) of Lck and its substrates (CD3ζ, Zap-70) was investigated in vivo, in Nef-expressing transgenic (Tg) thymocytes. In Tg cells, Lck was mis-localized and activated, but the pY-CD3ζ levels were unexpectedly lower, both constitutively and after anti-CD3ε Ab stimulation. Nef also favors the hyperphosphorylation of the Lck Y505 site and the accumulation of doubly phosphorylated (Y394, Y505) Lck. In contrast, after anti-CD3ε+anti-CD4 Ab stimulation, Nef decreased Lck activity and Lck was deprived of its pY partners. In Nef and LckY505F Tg thymocytes, Lck had similar activity but distinct LckY505 levels, Zap-70 pY phosphorylation, and Zap-70 activity, suggesting a different mode of Lck activation. Western blot analysis of Zap-70 with pY site-specific mAb showed modest enhanced levels of Zap-70pY292 and Zap-70pY493 (the latter required for its full activation) constitutively and after anti-CD3ε Ab stimulation, consistent with elevated Tg LATpY and suggesting a semiactive kinase. In fact, phenotypes of Nef Tg mice are very similar to those of mice harboring semiactive Zap-70 mutants. After anti-CD3ε+anti-CD4 stimulation, Tg Zap-70 activity and Zap-70pY493 levels were severely decreased, but Zap-70pY292 and Zap-70pY319 levels were barely affected, suggesting qualitative Lck defect. Rescue of Nef-mediated CD4+ T-cell loss with LckY505F in double (Nef × LckY505F) Tg mice correlated with greatly enhanced levels of Zap-70pY and Zap-70 activity. Thus, Nef impacts Lck in a unique way, triggering it to mis-phosphorylate its substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.