ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2025
Comparative effects of mechanical and functional alignment in bilateral robotic total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes and their relationship with gap patterns in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a clinical trial.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Trial
- Improved accuracy of functional alignment restoration with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty : A quasi-randomized controlled trial.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Trial
- Radiological and Clinical Evaluation of the Ipsilateral Ankle of Patients Who Underwent Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Total knee arthroplasty alignment strategies and their impact on ankle and hindfoot: a systematic review.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026Review
- Patient-Specific Restoration of Constitutional Alignment Within Predefined Safety Boundaries Using Three-Dimensional Navigation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Novel Surgical Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Femoral Trochlear Bisector as a New Landmark: Technical Description and Early Clinical Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Functional versus mechanical alignment in robotic primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.SICOT-J · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis between the coronal and sagittal axis angles of both knees and lumbar lordosis in middle-aged and elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional alignment (FA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can achieve soft tissue balance by fine-tuning adjustments of bony resections and component alignment with less soft tissue release. However, joint line orientation relative to the floor in the knee and ankle after TKA is not well studied.
methodsA randomized-controlled trial was performed in 30 patients with robotic-assisted bilateral TKA using FA and mechanical alignment (MA) in the same patient. The outcome measures were as follows: (1) standing radiographic knee and ankle alignment; (2) clinical outcomes at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively (including forgotten joint score (FJS), KOOS, knee range of motion); (3) patient satisfaction score; and (4) soft tissue release.
resultsPostoperative hip-knee-ankle angles between the FA and MA groups were similar (2.4° versus 2.4°, P = 0.952). Knee joint line orientation was significantly more parallel to the floor in the FA group (3.0° versus 4.7°, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in ankle joint line orientation relative to the floor in the FA and MA groups (91.0° versus 92.4°, P = 0.099 for tibial plafond inclination and 92.5° versus 93.2°, P = 0.564 for talar dome inclination). However, in knees with preoperative varus with apex distal joint line orientation (coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification type I), FA significantly achieved a more parallel knee and ankle joint line orientation relative to the floor (3.1° versus 5.1°, P = 0.002 for knee and 91.0° versus 93.5°, P = 0.028 for tibial plafond inclination). FA can obtain a balanced knee with significantly lower posteromedial releases (23.3% versus 76.7%, P < 0.001), with no superficial MCL release needed (0% versus 6.67%, P < 0.01). The FA group achieved significantly higher FJS at 3 months (53.3 versus 46.0, P = 0.015) and 6 months (67.8 versus 57.8, P < 0.001) with a higher patient satisfaction score (79.2 versus 84.3, P = 0.001).
conclusionFunctional alignment can control the overall lower limb alignment similarly to mechanical alignment, with a knee joint line more parallel to the floor. Additionally, the ankle joint line was more parallel in knees with CPAK type I. FA can also provide a more balanced knee with less soft tissue release, a higher functional score, and greater patient satisfaction compared to mechanical alignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.