ArticleBMC health services research2025
Evaluating the MPM III and SAPS III prognostic models in a war-affected, resource-limited setting: a prospective study from the Gaza Strip.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Civilian family members' deaths and perceived causes in war-torn Tigray, Ethiopia: modified poisson regression.Conflict and health · 2026Article
- Development and pilot testing of the AMPS model for predicting ICU mortality in low and middle income countries.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- War-related traumatic brain injury in Gaza: a multi-center prospective analysis of patterns and outcomes.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating pain management in the Gaza Strip's conflict-affected hospitals: a prospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Exploring maternal and neonatal health in a conflict-affected setting: cross-sectional findings from Gaza.Conflict and health · 2025Article
- Quality of life and access to healthcare among hemodialysis patients during wartime: cross-sectional insights from Gaza.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundValidation studies of prognostic models used in critical care have yet to be conducted in Palestine. The intense conflict in the Gaza Strip presents an opportunity to evaluate the performance of local ICUs and validate the performance of the MPM and SAPS models within a resource-limited and highly stressed healthcare system.
methodsA prospective study conducted from October to December 2024 included all patients admitted to ICUs in three of the four critical care units operating in the Gaza Strip. Sociodemographic, clinical, physiological, and laboratory parameters were collected, along with information regarding the clinical course and ICU outcomes. The MPM-III and SAPS-III scores were calculated, and their discrimination and calibration were assessed using AUROC and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, respectively. Furthermore, the difference between the predicted and actual mortality rates was visualized, and standardized mortality rates (SMR) were calculated. Except for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, a p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using R Studio.
resultsThe cohort included 101 patients, of whom 72.27% were surgical cases and 58.41% were admitted from the ER. The ICU mortality rate was 30.69%. The median duration of ICU admission was four days [IQR 2-9] and was significantly longer for surgical cases than for medical cases. Physiological and laboratory parameters, along with interventions associated with higher mortality, included a lower GCS, burns, elevated leukocyte and platelet counts, lower PPO2, dysrhythmias, intracranial mass effect, and the need for mechanical ventilation or central venous catheterization. The predicted mortality rates were 16.63% for MPM0-III and 16.82% for SAPS-III. SMRs indicated that both models underestimated ICU mortality (SMR, MPM0-III 1.85; SAPS-III 1.83), with the discrepancy more likely to occur in high-risk patients. ROC curves demonstrated acceptable to good discriminatory power for both models (AUROC, MPM0-III 0.79 (95% CI 0.7-0.88); SAPS-III 0.87 (95% CI 0.80-0.94)). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded statistically insignificant results for both models, indicating good calibration.
conclusionThe outcomes of critical care units in the Gaza Strip during the studied period of the war were comparable to those of other hospitals in the West Bank and other LMICs without active conflicts. The MPM-III and SAPS-III demonstrated good discrimination and calibration, making them valid tools for enhancing ICU performance and improving resource utilization in the Gaza Strip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.