Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329395›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2025

Individual-level cortical morphological network analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and prognostic insights.

Yifeng Yang, Meijing Yan, Lianxi Sun, Xiao Liu, Xuhao Fang, Shihong Li, Guangwu Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yifeng YangDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Meijing YanDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lianxi SunDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao LiuDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xuhao FangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 215192661@qq.com.
Shihong LiDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China. lishihong@fudan.edu.cn.
Guangwu LinDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China. lingw01000@163.com.

Funding

Hospital Development Centre SHDC2022DRT025Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23Y11907700Shanghai municipal population and family planning commission 202240257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes.

methodsWe enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery.

resultsBoth iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores.

conclusionsThe MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCerebral CortexHydrocephalus, Normal PressureNerve NetAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSupport Vector MachineDiagnosisIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusMorphological similarity networksMorphometric inverse divergence networkPrediction of shunt efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40329395
PMCPMC12057220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.