Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329383›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

Systemic therapy informed self-help and paraprofessional training in a naturalistic setting: study protocol of a digital randomised trial.

Pieter Erasmus, Moritz Borrmann, Ayesha Tariq Ali, Stefanie Herta, Jule Becker, Glen Moriarty, Gunther Meinlschmidt

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06017414 (Systemic Psychotherapy-informed Self-help and Paraprofessional Training in a Naturalistic Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06017414 nacompletednot on this map

Systemic Psychotherapy-informed Self-help and Paraprofessional Training in a Naturalistic Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorGunther MeinlschmidtRan2023 to 2024Enrolled222ConditionsPsychological DistressArmsSystemic Psychotherapy-informed Growth Path, Systemic Psychotherapy-informed Listener Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pieter ErasmusDivision of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, International Psychoanalytic University (IPU) Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Moritz BorrmannDivision of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, International Psychoanalytic University (IPU) Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ayesha Tariq Ali7 Cups, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Stefanie HertaDivision of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, International Psychoanalytic University (IPU) Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jule BeckerDivision of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, International Psychoanalytic University (IPU) Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Glen Moriarty7 Cups, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Gunther MeinlschmidtDivision of Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, International Psychoanalytic University (IPU) Berlin, Berlin, Germany. meinlschmidt@uni-trier.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple studies have shown the efficacy of Systemic Psychotherapy (ST) approaches as a promising path to address various mental health disorders and alleviate psychological distress. One promising path that requires further investigation is online self-help interventions and paraprofessional training. Our study aims to evaluate the implementation of delivering ST-informed online self-help interventions (OSI) and paraprofessional training in a naturalistic setting via the 7 Cups platform.

methodsOur exploratory, randomised, controlled, pre-post-follow-up study is recruiting two samples of participants: (i) for the ST-informed online self-help/growth path intervention amongst members on the 7 Cups platform, (ii) for the ST-informed online paraprofessional/listener training intervention amongst members who have registered as 'listener' status. The sample size target is N = 200 participants, randomly assigning and comparing 50 OSI member participants to 50 waitlist member participants and 50 paraprofessional/listener training listeners to 50 waitlist listener participants. Our sample size justification, based on previous feasibility studies and guidelines, suggests that a sample size of 50 per group, accounting for a 25% attrition rate, is sufficient to assess feasibility in online family, e-health, and mental health trials, while maintaining narrow margins of error for confidence intervals and primary outcome parameters. The primary outcome is non-specific psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; K6); secondary outcomes include perceived stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and momentary mood. To estimate intervention effects, we intend to conduct generalised linear mixed models of primary, and secondary parameters, adjusted for potential covariates (e.g., gender, age categories, socioeconomic status) as fixed effects. DISCUSSION: Despite the great need for mental health interventions, there is limited research available showing the efficacy of digitally delivered ST-informed interventions. This exploratory, randomized, controlled trial will yield robust insights into the feasibility, challenges, and user experience of novel, digital interventions on a widely accessible online platform (7 Cups).

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06017414, updated 21.11.2023). Registered 29 August 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06017414 .

Indexed as

Digital mental healthInterventionParaprofessional trainingPsychosocial distressSelf-helpSystemic psychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40329383
PMCPMC12057277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.