ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Analyses of proximal adjacent segment degeneration and prognostic factors after lumbar fusion surgery: study based on proximal facet joint angle.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical study on the 3D morphology and mechanical factors of lumbar facet joints in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLumbar fusion surgery is a common procedure for treating various degenerative spinal conditions. However, the incidence of proximal adjacent segment degeneration (PASD) remains a concern. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proximal facet joint angle (FJA) on PASD and then identify factors that influence prognosis after lumbar fusion surgery.
methodsIn this retrospective study, the cases of 192 patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery between January 2020 and June 2022 were analysed. Patients were classified in accordance with their baseline proximal FJA into the high (≥ 40°) and low (< 40°) FJA groups. Prognosis was evaluated during the last follow-up by using clinical, imaging and functional recovery criteria. PASD was assessed using Weishaupt criteria, and imaging parameters were measured on postoperative computed tomography (CT) reconstructions. Statistical analyses, including univariate and multivariate logistic regression, were performed to identify prognostic factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess predictive value.
resultsThe high FJA group exhibited significantly higher rates of PASD compared with the low FJA group (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in sex, age, body mass index (BMI) or follow-up duration between the two groups. Poor prognosis was associated with higher BMI, larger FJA and wider facet joint diameter. Logistic regression analysis identified BMI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.801, P = 0.001), FJA (OR = 6.320, P < 0.001) and facet joint sagittal (OR = 1.888, P < 0.001) and coronal (OR = 1.462, P < 0.001) diameters as independent predictors of poor prognosis. A smaller screw inclination angle was associated with better outcomes (OR = 0.907, P = 0.017). Joint ROC analysis underscored the significant predictive power of these factors (area under the curve = 0.881).
conclusionThis study demonstrates that a larger proximal FJA is associated with increased PASD. It also identifies several prognostic factors that influence outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery. Patients with higher BMI, larger FJA and wider sagittal and coronal diameters are at increased risk for poor prognosis. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive preoperative assessments to optimise surgical planning and improve outcomes in lumbar fusion surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.