ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2025
Sentences, entities, and keyphrases extraction from consumer health forums using multi-task learning.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOnline consumer health forums offer an alternative source of health-related information for internet users seeking specific details that may not be readily available through articles or other one-way communication channels. However, the effectiveness of these forums can be constrained by the limited number of healthcare professionals actively participating, which can impact response times to user inquiries. One potential solution to this issue is the integration of a semi-automatic system. A critical component of such a system is question processing, which often involves sentence recognition (SR), medical entity recognition (MER), and keyphrase extraction (KE) modules. We posit that the development of these three modules would enable the system to identify critical components of the question, thereby facilitating a deeper understanding of the question, and allowing for the re-formulation of more effective questions with extracted key information.
methodsThis work contributes to two key aspects related to these three tasks. First, we expand and publicly release an Indonesian dataset for each task. Second, we establish a baseline for all three tasks within the Indonesian language domain by employing transformer-based models with nine distinct encoder variations. Our feature studies revealed an interdependence among these three tasks. Consequently, we propose several multi-task learning (MTL) models, both in pairwise and three-way configurations, incorporating parallel and hierarchical architectures.
resultsUsing F1-score at the chunk level, the inter-annotator agreements for SR, MER, and KE tasks were
conclusionWe extended an Indonesian dataset for SR, MER, and KE tasks, resulted in 1, 173 labeled data points which splitted into 773 training instances, 200 validation instances, and 200 testing instances. We then used transformer-based models to set a baseline for all three tasks. Our MTL experiments suggested that additional information regarding the other two tasks could help the learning process for MER and KE tasks, while had only a small effect for SR task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.