Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329303›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025

"It seems enormously valuable to me." Perspectives of Dutch (potential) carriers of genetic FTD on onset-predictive biomarker testing.

Charlotte H Graafland, Harro Seelaar, Jessica L Panman, Lize C Jiskoot, Tjitske Kleefstra, Jackie M Poos, Edo Richard, Maartje H N Schermer, John C van Swieten, Laura Donker Kaat and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Charlotte H GraaflandDepartment of Public Health, section Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.graafland@erasmusmc.nl.
Harro SeelaarDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jessica L PanmanDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lize C JiskootDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tjitske KleefstraDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jackie M PoosDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Edo RichardDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maartje H N SchermerErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John C van SwietenDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Centre, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura Donker KaatDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eline M BunnikDepartment of Public Health, section Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 07330462210007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnset-predictive biomarker tests (OPBT) in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) may be used to recruit mutation carriers into preventive clinical trials before symptoms manifest. This would require disclosure of OPBT results to potential participants. This study investigates the perspectives of Dutch presymptomatic mutation carriers and individuals at 50% risk of genetic FTD on disclosure of OPBT results. It focuses on their willingness to receive OPBT results, what impacts they foresee from disclosure, and their preferences for the process of disclosure.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with presymptomatic mutation carriers and individuals at 50% risk of developing genetic FTD (n = 25), who had received genetic counselling or participate in a longitudinal cohort study. The interview transcripts were analysed using thematic inductive analysis.

resultsMain themes were: willingness to undergo biomarker testing, foreseen impact of test results, preferences regarding biomarker test features, and understanding of biomarker testing. Most participants would be willing to receive OPBT results in the context of clinical trial recruitment. Participants would also be willing to receive OPBT results without access to clinical trial participation, as they perceived utility from these results. They would use positive OPBT results to prepare for the future, e.g. by planning for care, drawing up advance care directives, retiring early, and spending final healthy years well. At the same time, they thought positive OPBT results might also have negative psychological impacts on self-image or social dynamics with others. Implications of positive OPBT results for self-image as healthy or ill differed between participants. Negative OPBT results would provide relief and not lead to life changes.

conclusionsDutch presymptomatic mutation carriers and individuals at 50% risk of developing genetic FTD tend to be willing to receive OPBT results. The results would allow for participation in a clinical trial and preparation for onset through personal life planning. At the same time, disclosure of OPBT results might have negative psychological consequences. This study provides valuable input for developing ethical guidance and an appropriate counselling process to ensure responsible disclosure of OPBT results with clinical trial recruitment.

Indexed as

Frontotemporal DementiaAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHeterozygoteHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMutationNetherlandsBiomarkersBiomarkerClinical trial recruitmentEthicsFrontotemporal dementiaGenetic counsellingOnset predictionStakeholder perspectives

Identifiers

PMID40329303
PMCPMC12054206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.