Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329302›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis.

Amanda L Sanchez, Chynna Mills, DeAuj'Zhane Coley, Katelin Hoskins, Florence Momplaisir, Robert Gross, Kathleen A Brady, Rinad S Beidas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amanda L SanchezDepartment of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. asanch49@gmu.edu.
Chynna MillsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
DeAuj'Zhane ColeyThe Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Katelin HoskinsDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Florence MomplaisirDepartment of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert GrossDepartment of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kathleen A BradyDivision of HIV Health, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rinad S BeidasDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Penn Mental Health AIDS Research CenterP30MH097488 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Karine Dube, Kelly L Jordan-Sciutto · 2013 to 2026
$23.5M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH097488Penn Center for AIDS Research CFAR; P30 045088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherence and retention in care are key targets to achieve favorable health outcomes for people with HIV. Challenges with adherence and retention are pronounced for marginalized communities facing intersectional structural oppression. Community health worker delivery of Managed Problem Solving (MAPS+), an evidence-based behavioral intervention, has the potential to improve adherence and retention, yet understanding structural inequities affecting people with HIV is necessary to increase the likelihood of equitable implementation. The current study explores systemic inequities influencing HIV care adherence and retention, and approaches to address these challenges. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 clinics and 4 constituent groups: prescribing clinicians, non-prescribing clinical team members (e.g., medical case managers), clinic administrators, and policymakers. Through reflexive thematic analysis within a constructionist paradigm, we identified two key themes. The first elucidated experiences of systemic inequities such as access to resources, healthcare system navigation difficulties, power differentials, medical mistrust, intersectional stigma and potential patient burden associated with MAPS+. The second theme highlighted the ways in which staff and clinicians shoulder the burden of addressing inequities by approaching people with HIV with dignity and developing trusting relationships and how MAPS + can bolster this approach by partnering with and centering patient needs. While these individual and organizational efforts are valuable, ending the HIV epidemic requires structural changes to address systemic inequities directly. This research underscores the complex interplay between structural oppression and HIV care, calling for comprehensive approaches to achieve health equity.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHIV InfectionsRespectTrustFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaHealth equityHIV careImplementation scienceRetention and adherence

Identifiers

PMID40329302
PMCPMC12057254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.