ArticleBMC medical education2025
Reflecting realities: gauging the pulse of simulator-based training in medical minds-resonance of simulator-based ultrasound training in medical education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating AI-powered instruction on Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) teaching outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Extended Reality at Bedside: Point-of-Care Simulation for Learning Point-of-Care Ultrasound.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Ultrasound Education for Medical Students: Principles, Training Approaches, and Current Controversies.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimulator-based training (SBT) transforms medical education from traditional methods to technology-driven simulations for safer, complex scenario learning. This study examines perceptions, benefits, drawbacks, and challenges of such training, focusing on ultrasound simulations among medical students and physicians.
methodsThe study surveyed 343 participants: 154 third-year medical students, 97 practical-year students, and 92 physicians across various specialties. A digital questionnaire was used to analyze their views on SBT, featuring main- and sub-items evaluated through a Likert scale and dichotomous questions.
resultsWidespread exposure to SBT was evident, notably in ultrasound simulator usage, where over 60% of all respondent groups reported prior experience. Significant disparities in acceptance and assessment between students and physicians were noted, particularly highlighting inconsistent integration into mandatory education and a marked deficit in physicians' training (p < 0.001). All groups acknowledged the relevance of SBT for developing practical skills and patient safety. The interest in ultrasound simulator use showed variability across specialties (p < 0.001). While ultrasound pathology training was highly valued, doubts about simulators replacing hands-on patient experience persisted.
conclusionsOur study highlights the necessity for enhanced integration of SBT within medical curricula. It highlights the significance of adaptive teaching methodologies and singles out ultrasound simulator training as essential for practical skill development. Future research should concentrate on creating comprehensive customized teaching strategies to elevate the quality of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.