Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329274›Full record

Trial reportHarm reduction journal2025

Centering peers in design and training for a peer-delivered contingency management program for self-identified harm reduction and treatment goals.

Linda Peng, Erin Stack, Alexis Cooke, Bryan Hartzler, Ryan Cook, Gillian Leichtling, Christi Hildebran, Judith Leahy, Kelsey Smith Payne, Lynn Kunkel and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05700994 (Peer Engagement in Methamphetamine Harm-Reduction With Contingency Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05700994 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Peer Engagement in Methamphetamine Harm-Reduction With Contingency Management (PEER-CM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled1,283ConditionsMethamphetamine AbuseArmsPeer Contingency Management, Standard of Care Contingency Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Linda PengDepartment of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code UHN30, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. pengli@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-9567
Erin StackComagine Health, Portland, OR, USA.
Alexis CookeComagine Health, Portland, OR, USA.
Bryan HartzlerAddictions, Drug and Alcohol Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ryan CookDepartment of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code UHN30, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Gillian LeichtlingComagine Health, Portland, OR, USA.
Christi HildebranComagine Health, Portland, OR, USA.
Judith LeahyHealth Systems Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, OR, USA.
Kelsey Smith PayneHealth Systems Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, OR, USA.
Lynn KunkelDepartment of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code UHN30, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Kim HoffmanDepartment of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code UHN30, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
P Todd KorthuisDepartment of Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code UHN30, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

Funding

Peer Engagement in Methamphetamine Harm-Reduction with Contingency Management (PEER-CM)R01DA057670 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Philip Todd Korthuis · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
Transporting treatment effects from clinical trials to real-world populations with co-occurring opioid and stimulant use disordersK01DA055130 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, RYAN · 2022 to 2025
$714k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA055130NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA057670SAMHSA HHS CFDA 93.788 #H79TI085732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel strategies are needed to engage people who use stimulants into the continuum of addiction care. Contingency management (CM) is the most effective intervention for stimulant use disorder and may engage non-treatment-seeking populations, especially when delivered by peer recovery support specialists (peers). We describe development and training for a novel peer-delivered CM program for stimulant use harm reduction and treatment engagement.

methodsWe used a community based participatory research (CBPR) process to develop a CM program focused on self-identified goals for harm reduction and treatment engagement. A steering committee of peers guided study design, CM rewards, schedule, and incentivized goals. Peers completed coaching-to-criterion of six CM skills based on the CM Competence Scale (CMCS), then completed a one-on-one roleplay with a standardized patient. Coaches rated peer performance of each CMCS skill according to its Likert scale (1 = Very Poor to 7 = Excellent) and an a priori rating criterion of 4 ('adequate'). Roleplays included feedback and a 'replay' of skills, if necessary.

resultsThe steering committee devised two CM interventions: an enhanced standard-of-care incentivizing peer visits ($20 for weekly peer visits) and an intervention that additionally incentivized self-directed goals ($20 for weekly peer visits and $30 for completed goal-related activities). Self-identified goal-related activities were chosen through a collaborative process and organized into 6 domains: (1) overdose/overamping prevention (2) substance use supports/treatment (3) daily living/housing (4) education/employment (5) mental/physical/spiritual health (6) social relationships. Forty-seven peers across nine peer-led organizations (three rural and six urban organizations across Oregon) completed CM training. All 47 peers met the a priori criterion in their roleplay, with seventeen (36%) requiring a 'replay' of a skill. Mean CMSC summary scores were 28.51 (SD 4.73) on the first attempt and 29.62 (SD 4.01) on the second attempt.

conclusionsPEER-CM (Peers Expanding Engagement in Stimulant Harm Reduction with Contingency Management) is among the first trials to use peer-delivered CM for stimulant use, incentivizing peer engagement and self-identified goals for harm reduction and treatment engagement. A CBPR approach strengthened the study design by incorporating peer guidance. Peers in this large, multisite sample demonstrated adequate CM delivery skills with acceptable fidelity following training. Trial Registration This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05700994). Registered 26 January, 2023.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyHarm ReductionPeer GroupSubstance-Related DisordersAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleGoalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedBehavior therapyCommunity-based participatory researchMethamphetamineMotivationPsychosocial interventionReinforcementStimulantsSubstance-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID40329274
PMCPMC12057027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.