ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Equity, power and resources in primary health care reform: insights from Aotearoa New Zealand.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNew Zealand's District Health Board reform (2000-2022) was underpinned by the goal of reducing inequities in health outcomes between population groups and improving health overall. A key policy vehicle for achieving the goal was a system-wide shift to population health with increased strategic focus on and investment in primary health care.
methodsThis research explored shifts in power and resource to understand how equity as a policy goal for primary health care fared over the District Health Board era, and examined how the distribution of power and resources in the health sector changed for PHC over the period 2000-2020. The study used an exploratory case study methodology based on insights from key informant interviews.
resultsThe study found that despite policy intent, actors holding political power shaped health outcomes under the reforms, curtailing the mechanisms that could have made a significant impact on equitable health outcomes between population groups.
conclusionIt concludes that exploring power and resource shifts sheds light on power dynamics within a reform. Since power shapes how resources are deployed, attention to power and resource complements technical elements of health system reform, by helping to understand where and how to intervene so that reforms achieve their desired goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.