ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Validation of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact for Clinical Use (SYMPACT-CP): a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT) questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptoms and impacts in clinical trials. It includes recall periods of 24 h for symptoms and 7 days for impacts. The PAH-SYMPACT for use in Clinical Practice (SYMPACT-CP) is an adaptation of the PAH-SYMPACT in which the recall period for symptoms has been revised to 7 days, a timeframe more appropriate for clinical practice settings. The PAH-SYMPACT was psychometrically validated previously. As such, this study focused on assessing whether patients with PAH can use the SYMPACT-CP appropriately to rate their symptoms over the 7-day range, and it explored their perspectives on the utility and feasibility of completing the questionnaire as part of routine clinical assessments.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional, noninterventional, qualitative study involving one-on-one telephone interviews with English-speaking adults (≥ 18 years) living in the US diagnosed with PAH. Participants were provided copies of the SYMPACT-CP to review, and interviews were subsequently conducted using a semi-structured guide including concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing sections. Transcripts were coded using a coding framework based on the interview guide.
resultsFifteen participants were interviewed (mean age, 49.9 years; n = 13 female, n = 13 White). Most (n = 12) stated that they thought about the last 7 calendar days or the "last week" when asked to interpret the 7-day recall period and all but one (n = 14) could easily remember their symptoms over this period. All 15 participants reported that it would be easy to fill out the SYMPACT-CP prior to a clinic visit with their physician or other healthcare provider (HCP), and most (n = 14) felt it would be useful in the management of their disease. Participants felt that breathing difficulties (n = 11), followed by swelling (n = 4), feeling lightheaded, dizzy, or faint (n = 3), and heart palpitations/heart fluttering (n = 3) were the most important symptoms to share with their HCPs.
conclusionsThe SYMPACT-CP is valid to assess symptoms and impacts of PAH in clinical practice. Compared with the PAH-SYMPACT, it provides a consistent 7-day recall period for symptoms and impacts and may improve symptom monitoring and disease management during clinical appointments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.