Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329256›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025

Validation of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact for Clinical Use (SYMPACT-CP): a qualitative interview study.

Stacy Davis, Anne Skalicky, Amélie Beaudet, Bjorn Bayer, Leah Kleinman

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stacy DavisJanssen Global Services, LLC, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA. sdavis26@its.jnj.com.
Anne SkalickyEvidera, Broderick Building 615 2nd Ave, Suite 500, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Amélie BeaudetActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Hegenheimermattweg 167C, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland.
Bjorn BayerActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Hegenheimermattweg 167C, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland.
Leah KleinmanEvidera, Broderick Building 615 2nd Ave, Suite 500, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT) questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptoms and impacts in clinical trials. It includes recall periods of 24 h for symptoms and 7 days for impacts. The PAH-SYMPACT for use in Clinical Practice (SYMPACT-CP) is an adaptation of the PAH-SYMPACT in which the recall period for symptoms has been revised to 7 days, a timeframe more appropriate for clinical practice settings. The PAH-SYMPACT was psychometrically validated previously. As such, this study focused on assessing whether patients with PAH can use the SYMPACT-CP appropriately to rate their symptoms over the 7-day range, and it explored their perspectives on the utility and feasibility of completing the questionnaire as part of routine clinical assessments.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional, noninterventional, qualitative study involving one-on-one telephone interviews with English-speaking adults (≥ 18 years) living in the US diagnosed with PAH. Participants were provided copies of the SYMPACT-CP to review, and interviews were subsequently conducted using a semi-structured guide including concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing sections. Transcripts were coded using a coding framework based on the interview guide.

resultsFifteen participants were interviewed (mean age, 49.9 years; n = 13 female, n = 13 White). Most (n = 12) stated that they thought about the last 7 calendar days or the "last week" when asked to interpret the 7-day recall period and all but one (n = 14) could easily remember their symptoms over this period. All 15 participants reported that it would be easy to fill out the SYMPACT-CP prior to a clinic visit with their physician or other healthcare provider (HCP), and most (n = 14) felt it would be useful in the management of their disease. Participants felt that breathing difficulties (n = 11), followed by swelling (n = 4), feeling lightheaded, dizzy, or faint (n = 3), and heart palpitations/heart fluttering (n = 3) were the most important symptoms to share with their HCPs.

conclusionsThe SYMPACT-CP is valid to assess symptoms and impacts of PAH in clinical practice. Compared with the PAH-SYMPACT, it provides a consistent 7-day recall period for symptoms and impacts and may improve symptom monitoring and disease management during clinical appointments.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPulmonary Arterial HypertensionAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical practicePAH-SYMPACTPatient-reported outcomePulmonary arterial hypertensionQualitative researchSYMPACT-CPSymptoms

Identifiers

PMID40329256
PMCPMC12057195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.