Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329235›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Barriers and facilitators of the implementation of mammography screening in the Brazilian public health system: scoping review.

Danila Cristina Paquier Sala, Oswaldo Yoshimi Tanaka, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Alexandre Pazetto Balsanelli, Sonia Isoyama Venancio, Marília Cristina Prado Louvison, Ana A Baumann

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danila Cristina Paquier SalaPaulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. danilapaquiersala@gmail.com.
Oswaldo Yoshimi TanakaFaculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Reginaldo Adalberto LuzSanta Casa de São Paulo, School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre Pazetto BalsanelliPaulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sonia Isoyama VenancioMinistry of Health, Secretary of Primary Health Care, General Coordination of Child Health and Breastfeeding, Brasília, Brazil.
Marília Cristina Prado LouvisonFaculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana A BaumannWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are high incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer in Brazil. Brazilian's social and economic disparities, along with complexities of its health system pose challenges to the appropriate implementation of mammography screening as a public policy for the population. In 2015, the Ministry of Health updated the recommendations for the early detection of breast cancer, which had, until then, been based on specialists' consensus, maintaining biennial screening mammography for women aged 50-69 years. However, the screening coverage did not exceed 25% of the expected number of exams for the Brazilian population who use the public health system. The objective of this study was to analyze barriers and facilitators (determinants) of opportunistic mammography screening in the Brazilian public health system.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review to examine the extent to which guidelines have been implemented from 2015 to 2025, excluding those that (1) did not include the population aged 50 to 69 years, (2) did not discuss mammographic screening in the Brazilian public health system, (3) included populations with cancer or at high risk of cancer. Results were coded into the domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

resultsIn the 85 articles selected, we coded 74 determinants, 50 referring to barriers and 24 to facilitators. The barriers were related to the outer setting 18(24.3%), inner setting 11(14.9%), characteristics of individuals 9(12.2%), process 6(8.1%), and intervention characteristics 6(8.1%). The facilitators were related to the outer setting 14(18.9%), inner setting 5(6.8%), intervention characteristics 3(4.1%) and individual characteristics 2(2.7%).

conclusionUsing CFIR helps understand the multiple interrelated factors that affect the implementation of opportunistic mammographic screening in the Brazilian public health system. Our results can provide initial data for further studies that aim to improve and organize the implementation of mammography screening in Brazil.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyMass ScreeningAgedBrazilFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPublic HealthBrazilBreast neoplasmsImplementation scienceMammographyMass screening

Identifiers

PMID40329235
PMCPMC12054288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.