Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329234›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

A simulation-based network analysis of intervention targets for comorbid symptoms of depression and anxiety in Chinese healthcare workers in the post-dynamic zero-COVID policy era.

Chao Zhang, Ruyong Li, Wei Zhang, Yanqiang Tao, Xiangping Liu, Yichao Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chao ZhangSchool of Education Science, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2116-5819
Ruyong LiSchool of Education Science, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID 0009-0002-9780-6651
Wei ZhangSchool of Education Science, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan, China.
Yanqiang TaoFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0301-3985
Xiangping LiuFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8764-2038
Yichao LvFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. psychleo@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-2479

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter the official end of the dynamic zero-COVID policy in China, healthcare workers continued to heavy workloads and psychological stress. In this new phase, concerns related to work and family, rather than infection, may have become new sources of psychological issues such as depression and anxiety among healthcare workers, leading to new patterns of comorbidity. However, few studies have addressed these issues. To fill this gap, this study used network analysis to examine new features and mechanisms of comorbidity between depression and anxiety symptoms, and simulated symptom-specific interventions to identify effective targets for intervention.

methodsA total of 708 Chinese healthcare workers (71.2% females; Age: M = 37.55, SD = 9.37) were recruited and completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). This study first calculated the incidence rates of anxiety, depression, and their comorbidity, and then constructed the comorbid Ising network. Central and bridge symptoms were identified with expected influence (EI) and bridge EI, respectively. The NodeIdentifyR algorithm (NIRA) was then used to simulate interventions within the network, examining the effects of alleviating or aggravating specific symptoms on the network's severity.

results48.2% of Chinese healthcare workers reported experiencing depression (19.8%), anxiety (11.7%), or both (16.2%). In the anxiety-depression network, "guilt" and "appetite changes" were identified as the central symptoms, and "guilt" and "excessive worry" were identified as the bridge symptoms. Simulated interventions suggested that alleviating "Anhedonia" can the most reduce the overall severity of the network, while aggravating "guilt" can the most increase the overall severity. These two symptoms were considered the key target for treatment and prevention, respectively.

conclusionsChinese healthcare workers still face high risk of depression, anxiety, and comorbidity in the post-dynamic zero-COVID policy era. Our findings highlight the key roles of guilt, appetite changes, and excessive worry in the network of depression and anxiety symptoms. Future research should apply the results of the simulated interventions, develop intervention strategies targeting anhedonia, and focus on preventing guilt to improve the healthcare workers' mental health.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersCOVID-19DepressionHealth PersonnelAdultChinaComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnxietyChinese healthcare workersComorbidityDepressionNetwork analysisNodeIdentifyR algorithm

Identifiers

PMID40329234
PMCPMC12057238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.