Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329224›Full record

Observational studyBMC neurology2025

Real-World Safety and Efficacy of 156 U - 195 U OnabotulinumtoxinA in Adults With Chronic Migraine: Results From the REPOSE Study.

Fayyaz Ahmed, Charly Gaul, Katja Kollewe, Ritu C Singh, Katherine Sommer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01686581 (A 24-month, Prospective, Non-interventional Study to Describe the Long Term, Real-Life Use of BOTOX® for the Symptomatic Treatment of Adults With Chronic Migraine, Measuring Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Patient Reported Outcomes Observed in Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01686581 completednot on this map

A 24-month, Prospective, Non-interventional Study to Describe the Long Term, Real-Life Use of BOTOX® for the Symptomatic Treatment of Adults With Chronic Migraine, Measuring Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Patient Reported Outcomes Observed in Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorAllerganRan2012 to 2016Enrolled641ConditionsMigraine DisordersArmsbotulinum toxin Type A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fayyaz AhmedSpire Hesslewood Clinic, Hull York Medical School, Brough, Hull, UK. fayyaz.ahmed@nhs.net.
Charly GaulHeadache Center Franfurt, Franfurt, Germany.
Katja KolleweMedical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Ritu C SinghAbbVie, Madison, NJ, USA.
Katherine Sommer, Marlow, SL7 1YA, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe phase 3 PREEMPT clinical trials confirmed the efficacy and safety of 155 U - 195 U onabotulinumtoxinA for individuals with chronic migraine (CM) and is the licensed dose in Canada and Europe. This analysis aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety parameters of 155 U - 195 U onabotulinumtoxinA in participants with CM from the real-world REPOSE study.

methodsREPOSE (NCT01686581) was a 2-year, prospective, observational, noninterventional, open-label study that described the real-world use of onabotulinumtoxinA in adults with CM in Europe. Participants received onabotulinumtoxinA approximately every 12 weeks and were monitored for 24 months after starting treatment. Data on participant-estimated mean headache-day frequency in the last month (MHD), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) scores, and adverse events (AEs) were collected at each treatment visit. Participants in the safety analysis population (those who received at least one dose of onabotulinumtoxinA) were stratified into two groups based on the dosage received at four or more treatment visits: 155 U onabotulinumtoxinA and 156 U - 195 U onabotulinumtoxinA groups.

resultsA total of 641 participants were enrolled at 77 centers. Of those, 218 participants received 155 U ≥ 4 treatment visits, and 77 participants received 156 U-195 U onabotulinumtoxinA ≥ 4 treatment visits. Between-group baseline characteristics were similar. Reductions from baseline in MHD frequency were observed at both doses (156 U - 195 U range, -8.7 to -14.2 MHDs; 155 U range, -8.2 to -11.9 MHDs). Mean change from baseline in MSQ domain scores improved across administration visits for both 155 U onabotulinumtoxinA and 156 U - 195 U onabotulinumtoxinA groups. Treatment with 156 U - 195 U onabotulinumtoxinA was safe and generally well-tolerated with no new safety signals identified. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were reported in 51/218 in the 155 U group and 10/77 participants in the 156 U - 195 U group; serious adverse drug reactions were 3/218 and 1/77, respectively. The most frequently reported ADR across both dose groups was eyelid ptosis, followed by neck pain, musculoskeletal stiffness.

conclusionsThese real-world findings of the safety and efficacy of the 155 U - 195 U onabotulinumtoxinA doses are consistent with data from the PREEMPT clinical trials as a treatment option for CM patients.

trial registrationNCT01686581. Name of registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. URL of registry: Date of retrospective registration: September 18, 2012. Date of enrolment of first patient: July 23, 2012.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AMigraine DisordersNeuromuscular AgentsAdultChronic DiseaseEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsonabotulinum toxin AChronic migraineEfficacyHeadacheOnabotulinumtoxinAPatient-reported outcomesReal-world studySafety

Identifiers

PMID40329224
PMCPMC12053858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.