Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329223›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Influenza and pneumococcal vaccine hesitancy in the elderly population: results from two representative surveys in Germany.

Dorothee Heinemeier, Philipp Schmid, Sarah Eitze, Cornelia Betsch, Vaccination60+ study group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dorothee HeinemeierInstitute for Planetary Health Behaviour, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, 99089, Germany. dorothee.heinemeier@uni-erfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-1901
Philipp SchmidInstitute for Planetary Health Behaviour, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, 99089, Germany.
Sarah EitzeInstitute for Planetary Health Behaviour, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, 99089, Germany.
Cornelia BetschInstitute for Planetary Health Behaviour, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, 99089, Germany.
Vaccination60+ study group

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research Germany (BMBF) via the InfectControl2020 consortium 03ZZ0819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reasons for low influenza and pneumococcal vaccine acceptance in the elderly population are largely unknown - despite the great need of vaccines in this risk group. While many studies examine the relationship between factors influencing vaccination, such as sociodemographic characteristics and influenza and pneumococcal vaccination intentions and behavior, psychological factors, such as vaccine-specific attitudes, are underutilized in research on vaccination behaviors and intervention strategies. This article assesses the psychological antecedents of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly and assesses the predictive power of psychological vs. sociodemographic and other factors surrounding vaccination, on vaccination behavior.

methodsA cross-sectional telephone survey, representative of age, gender and rural/urban residence, was conducted with N = 701 German participants > 60 years of age, during the influenza season of 2016-17. Multiple logistic regressions were conducted to identify the relevant determinants of vaccination behavior.

resultsResults show unique patterns in the psychological antecedents: while confidence, the belief in the effectiveness of vaccination and calculation, the need for information, complacency, the lack of risk perception and constraints, and perceived practical barriers to vaccination predicted influenza vaccination behavior, only complacency predicted pneumococcal vaccination behavior. The amount of explained variance in influenza vaccination behavior nearly doubles when psychological antecedents of vaccination are taken into account, beyond other factors surrounding vaccination. However, the effect was smaller for pneumococcal vaccination behavior. The results are compared to a subnational sample.

conclusionsUnderstanding the psychological drivers of vaccination can help to plan interventions effectively.

trial registrationDeutsches Register Klinische Studien (German Clinical Trials Register) DRKS00012653. Registered 24.11.2017. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPneumococcal VaccinesVaccination HesitancyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumococcal InfectionsSurveys and QuestionnairesInfluenza VaccinesPneumococcal VaccinesBehavioral insightsVaccinationVaccineVaccine behavior

Identifiers

PMID40329223
PMCPMC12054266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.