ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Genomic and phenotypic insights into ST164 bla
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global and regional prevalence of metallo-β-lactamases in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative genomic and resistance characterization of ST2 and ST164 carbapenem-resistantMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Comparative genomic insights into carbapenem-resistant versus susceptibleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Carbapenem-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCarbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) poses a critical global threat, especially in ICUs. Yet, reports on ST164 CRAB harboring bla
methodsBacterial identification was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed via agar and broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing employed Illumina NovaSeq 6000 and Oxford Nanopore platforms. Resistance genes, insertion elements, transposons, and integrons were detected using ResFinder, PlasmidFinder, VFDB, ISFinder, pdifFinder, and IntegronFinder. Strains were typed by MLST, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with kSNP3.0. Genetic environment diagrams were generated using Easyfig 2.2.5.
resultsTwo bla
conclusionThis study provides the genomic and phenotypic characterization of intestinally colonized ST164 bla
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.