ArticleBMC public health2025
Acceptance of advance care planning among older adults in Mainland China: a national cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Willingness to participate in advance care planning among older adults with relatively high educational attainment in a continuing care retirement community of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Multilevel determinants of medication adherence among Chinese patients with chronic diseases: an ecological analysis based on the health ecology model.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of advance care planning engagement among Chinese older adults.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Preferences for advance care planning services among patients with recurrent stroke: a discrete choice experiment.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Perspectives of Japanese Citizens on Advance Care Planning in Clinical Settings: Findings From a Focus Group Study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcceptance of advance care planning (ACP) among older adults is important for the promotion of ACP. It is of great importance to explore the acceptance of ACP and associated influencing factors among older adults in China based on the health ecology model (HEM).
methodsBased on a national cross-sectional study in 2022, 4,180 older adults were included. Stepwise linear regression was used to analyze factors associated with acceptance of ACP using SPSS 26.0, based on the HEM. Acceptance scores were calculated based on a self-assessment visual analog scale (range, 0 ~ 100, with higher scores indicating higher acceptance of ACP).
results50.05% (2,092) of 4,180 participants were female. The median acceptance of ACP score was 64, and the range was (49, 81). In addition, the study found higher well-being index (β = 0.086; 95% CI, 0.199 to 0.535; P < 0.001) and health literacy (β = 0.054; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.423; P = 0.006) scores, broader media use behaviors (β = 0.064; 95% CI, 0.127 to 0.419; P < 0.001), and a higher per capita monthly household income (β = 0.086; 95% CI, 1.827 to 3.825; P < 0.001) were associated with a higher acceptance of ACP, while participants with higher depression scores (β = -0.06; 95% CI, -0.435 to -0.129; P < 0.001), larger social network (β = -0.054; 95% CI, -3.289 to -0.937; P < 0.001), and health insurance (β = -0.04; 95% CI, -7.294 to -1.027; P = 0.008) demonstrated a lower acceptance of ACP.
conclusionsFor the first time, this study revealed basic personal information, economic status, media use, social networks, health knowledge, and mental health as the main factors associated with acceptance of ACP among older adults in mainland China. These findings were of great significant for enhancing healthcare quality and the overall quality of life for older adults in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.