ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Exploring fecal microbial activity in zoo felids of varying body mass on a similar diet.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Characterization of the Air Microbiome and Associated Toxicological Hazards in a Zoological Garden.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The faecal microbiota and its influence on fur seal (Arctocephalus sp.) physiology.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Under human care, felids are typically fed similar diets, unlike wild counterparts whose diets vary by body mass and ecology. This study evaluated fecal microbiota and fermentation products in 18 zoo felids from Pairi Daiza Zoo, Belgium, grouped by body mass: under 100 kg ("small") and over 100 kg ("large"), with 9 animals in each group. Fresh feces were collected from the rectum under anesthesia. Microbial composition was assessed via 16S rRNA gene sequencing, while the fecal volatile fatty acids were quantified using gas chromatography. At the phylum level, regardless of body mass, the gut microbiota of zoo felids was predominantly composed of Firmicutes (61.7%), Actinobacteria (16.4%) and Bacteroidetes (12.5%). At the genus level, the most abundant genus was Clostridium sensu stricto 1 (15.9%), followed by Collinsella (15.7%). Although no significant differences in microbial composition or alpha diversity were found, beta diversity showed body mass influenced overall microbial structure. Smaller felids had significantly higher acetate levels than larger felids (p < 0.01). Additionally, acetate proportions were positively correlated with Clostridium sensu stricto 13 (r = 0.6, p < 0.01) and Peptoniphilus (r = 0.5, p < 0.05). These results show particular associations between body mass and the response of the intestinal microbiome to diet, suggesting that a uniform diet may not suit all felids under human care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.