Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329193›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Stacking classifiers based on integrated machine learning model: fusion of CT radiomics and clinical biomarkers to predict lymph node metastasis in locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Tong Ling, Zhichao Zuo, Mingwei Huang, Jie Ma, Liucheng Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [CGP-Net: Cross-modal guided prior network for precise gastric cancer segmentation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tong Ling *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhichao Zuo *School of Mathematics and Computational Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan province, China.
Mingwei HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jie MaDepartment of Medical Imaging, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Liucheng WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China. wuliucheng@gxmu.edu.cn.

Funding

The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of GuangXi No. 2024GXNSFAA010407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe early prediction of lymph node positivity (LN+) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is crucial for optimizing individualized treatment strategies. This study aimed to integrate radiomic features and clinical biomarkers through machine learning (ML) approaches to enhance prediction accuracy by focusing on patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 277 patients with LAGC and randomly divided them into training (n = 193) and validation (n = 84) sets at a 7:3 ratio. In total, 1,130 radiomics features were extracted from pre-treatment portal venous phase computed tomography scans. These features were linearly combined to develop a radiomics score (rad score) through feature engineering. Then, using the rad score and clinical biomarkers as input features, we applied simple statistical strategies (relying on a single ML model) and integrated statistical strategies (including classification model integration techniques, such as hard voting, soft voting, and stacking) to predict LN+ post-NAC. The diagnostic performance of the model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves with corresponding areas under the curve (AUC).

resultsOf all ML models, the stacking classifier, an integrated statistical strategy, exhibited the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.859 for predicting LN+ in patients with LAGC. This predictive model was transformed into a publicly available online risk calculator.

conclusionsWe developed a stacking classifier that integrates radiomics and clinical biomarkers to predict LN+ in patients with LAGC undergoing surgical resection, providing personalized treatment insights.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMachine LearningStomach NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorLymphatic metastasisMachine learningNeoadjuvant therapyPrognosisStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40329193
PMCPMC12057267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.