ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Multi-proteins similarity-based sampling to select representative genomes from large databases.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenome sequence databases are growing exponentially, but with high redundancy and uneven data quality. For these reasons, selecting representative subsets of genomes is an essential step for almost all studies. However, most current sampling approaches are biased and unable to process large datasets in a reasonable time.
methodsHere we present MPS-Sampling (Multiple-Protein Similarity-based Sampling), a fast, scalable, and efficient method for selecting reliable and representative samples of genomes from very large datasets. Using families of homologous proteins as input, MPS-Sampling delineates homogeneous groups of genomes through two successive clustering steps. Representative genomes are then selected within these groups according to predefined or user-defined priority criteria.
resultsMPS-Sampling was applied to a dataset of 48 ribosomal protein families from 178,203 bacterial genomes to generate representative genome sets of various size, corresponding to a sampling of 32.17% down to 0.3% of the complete dataset. An in-depth analysis shows that the selected genomes are both taxonomically and phylogenetically representative of the complete dataset, demonstrating the relevance of the approach.
conclusionMPS-Sampling provides an efficient, fast and scalable way to sample large collections of genomes in an acceptable computational time. MPS-Sampling does not rely on taxonomic information and does not require the inference of phylogenetic trees, thus avoiding the biases inherent in these approaches. As such, MPS-Sampling meets the needs of a growing number of users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.