Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329185›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Confidence in providing primary care to patients with low back pain among physiotherapists.

Ron Shavit, Talma Kushnir, Yaniv Nudelman, Asaf Weisman, Shmuel Springer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ron ShavitThe Neuromuscular & Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Talma KushnirDepartment of Psychology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Yaniv NudelmanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Asaf WeismanSpinal Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Shmuel SpringerThe Neuromuscular & Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel. Shmuels@ariel.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder with distinct clinical features. Direct access to physiotherapy (PT), with physiotherapists (PTs) acting as primary care providers, can improve the management of individuals with LBP. However, clinician confidence may affect their willingness to provide primary care as well as their performance as primary care providers. The objectives of this study were: (1) to develop the Primary Care Confidence Scale (PCCS), and (2) to evaluate PTs' confidence in managing LBP in primary care.

methodsThe PCCS questionnaire was developed through a seven-stage Delphi process involving experts who modified an existing self-confidence scale. The questionnaire was completed by 314 PTs, 140 of whom completed it again after 2 weeks. Structural validity was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for test-retest reliability. Spearman tests assessed correlations between background characteristics and PCCS scores. Two independent t-tests estimated the effects of gender and post-graduate education. One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the impact of the workplace.

resultsThe PCCS had a multidimensional structure with three factors demonstrating an acceptable model fit and good reliability (α = 0.83, ICC = 0.78). The mean confidence level was 75% (PCCS = 45 ± 6/60), with moderate positive correlations observed between PCCS scores and both age (r = 0.42, p < 0.001) and years of experience (r = 0.33, p < 0.001). PTs working in public or private outpatient clinics had significantly higher scores (PCCS = 45.3 and 47.0, respectively) compared to PTs working in an inpatient hospital or in rehabilitation centers (PCCS = 40.6 and 40.3, respectively, p < 0.009).

conclusionsThe newly developed PCCS demonstrated adequate validity and high reliability, suggesting that it is suitable for measuring confidence in treating patients with LBP in primary care settings. PTs demonstrated confidence levels indicative of their perception to manage patients in primary care. Health policy makers and educators could incorporate the PCCS into training and evaluation programs to assess clinicians' confidence and perceived readiness to treat LBP in primary care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelLow Back PainPhysical TherapistsPrimary Health CareAdultDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesConfidenceDirect accessLow back painPhysiotherapyPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID40329185
PMCPMC12054311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.