ArticleBMC primary care2025
Confidence in providing primary care to patients with low back pain among physiotherapists.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- User-Centered Virtual Clinic Services for Remote, Rural, and Underserved Sub-Saharan Africa: Development and Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Enhancing Clinical Confidence: Effects of Medical Screening and Differential Diagnosis Training for Low Back Pain.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder with distinct clinical features. Direct access to physiotherapy (PT), with physiotherapists (PTs) acting as primary care providers, can improve the management of individuals with LBP. However, clinician confidence may affect their willingness to provide primary care as well as their performance as primary care providers. The objectives of this study were: (1) to develop the Primary Care Confidence Scale (PCCS), and (2) to evaluate PTs' confidence in managing LBP in primary care.
methodsThe PCCS questionnaire was developed through a seven-stage Delphi process involving experts who modified an existing self-confidence scale. The questionnaire was completed by 314 PTs, 140 of whom completed it again after 2 weeks. Structural validity was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for test-retest reliability. Spearman tests assessed correlations between background characteristics and PCCS scores. Two independent t-tests estimated the effects of gender and post-graduate education. One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the impact of the workplace.
resultsThe PCCS had a multidimensional structure with three factors demonstrating an acceptable model fit and good reliability (α = 0.83, ICC = 0.78). The mean confidence level was 75% (PCCS = 45 ± 6/60), with moderate positive correlations observed between PCCS scores and both age (r = 0.42, p < 0.001) and years of experience (r = 0.33, p < 0.001). PTs working in public or private outpatient clinics had significantly higher scores (PCCS = 45.3 and 47.0, respectively) compared to PTs working in an inpatient hospital or in rehabilitation centers (PCCS = 40.6 and 40.3, respectively, p < 0.009).
conclusionsThe newly developed PCCS demonstrated adequate validity and high reliability, suggesting that it is suitable for measuring confidence in treating patients with LBP in primary care settings. PTs demonstrated confidence levels indicative of their perception to manage patients in primary care. Health policy makers and educators could incorporate the PCCS into training and evaluation programs to assess clinicians' confidence and perceived readiness to treat LBP in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.