ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Two-stage multiple imputation with a longitudinal composite variable.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMissing data are common in longitudinal studies. Multiple imputation (MI) is widely used to handle missing data. However, most of the MI methods assume various missing data types as missing at random (MAR) in imputation. Two-stage MI is a flexible method that accounts for two types of missing data in a two-step process, allowing researchers to employ diverse assumptions regarding the mechanisms underlying the missing data. This method has immense potential yet limited application and extension within the field.
methodsWe evaluated the performance of two-stage MI in a novel context, imputing a composite variable constructed from several continuous and binary components in the longitudinal setting while handling missing data due to MAR and missing not at random (MNAR). Additionally, we compared three fully conditional specification (FCS) methods within the two-stage MI framework. Simulation studies were conducted using a longitudinal dataset that mimicked a cohort study. Sensitivity analysis was performed with various ignorability assumptions.
resultsIn simulation studies, the imputation models within two-stage MI, assuming appropriate ignorability assumptions, exhibited the smallest bias and achieved optimal coverage probabilities for the means, slopes across different time points, and hazard ratios for mortality related to the composite variable. The FCS methods that incorporated longitudinal information yielded the best performance in most scenarios.
conclusionsIn the context of a longitudinal composite variable with missing values due to various missing mechanisms, the selection of imputation methods and ignorability assumptions plays an important role within the two-stage MI framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.