ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2025
Efficacy of crystallized and liquid form phenol application in pilonidal sinus disease: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early postoperative outcomes of sinus laser closure versus crystallized phenol treatment for pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective comparative study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Treatment Outcomes of Presacral Pilonidal Sinus Disease Using Crystallised Phenol: A Single-Centre Clinical Series.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Comparison of Phenol Application and Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment in Pediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIM AND
objectivePilonidal sinus is a frequently observed disease in young adult male patients. Although its treatment is traditionally surgical, the tendency to use minimally invasive interventions has increased over time. This study aims to compare the clinical results of the non-surgical treatment methods for pilonidal sinus: crystallized and liquid phenol applications. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 102 patients treated with phenol application in the General Surgery Clinic of our hospital between July 2017 and July 2019. Eighty patients were included in the study: 40 treated with crystallized phenol and 40 with liquid phenol. In the 1st month following the application, the recovery rates, complication rates, persistence of complaints, and recurrence at the end of the 1st year were compared between the groups.
resultsThe mean age was 25.60 ± 7.16 and 25.78 ± 7.83 years in the crystallized (group 1) and liquid phenol group (group 2), respectively. Complications observed up to the 3rd week of follow-up were considered early complications, while those observed after the 3rd week were considered late complications. Early complications were observed in 15% and 37.5% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.042). Early complications were significantly higher in the liquid phenol group compared to the crystallized phenol group. At the end of the 1st year, 90% improvement was detected in group 1 and 95% in group 2. However, there was no significant difference between the recovery and recurrence rates between the groups.
conclusionIn pilonidal sinus treatment, successful results are obtained with both crystallized and liquid phenol application. Both methods can be performed safely and easily as an alternative treatment method to surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.