ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
Sensorimotor simulation and distributed processing of biological motion: Insights from healthy and paraplegic adults.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding biological motion through the lens of animate motion processing.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The processing of biological motion (BM), particularly the local motion cues tracing the movements of crucial joints, is vital for social interaction and human survival. While numerous studies have focused on the brain mechanisms underlying BM processing, the contribution of sensorimotor simulation at peripheral effectors remains unclear. In this study, we examined healthy adults and paraplegic spinal cord injury participants to investigate this issue. For healthy adults, both intact BM stimuli and local BM cues without global configuration induced a temporal dilation effect when sitting (sensorimotor simulation accessible), but not when standing (sensorimotor simulation temporarily hindered). In contrast, for participants with permanently hindered sensorimotor simulation, the temporal dilation effect was observed only with intact BM stimuli but not with local BM cues, indicating a robust reliance on sensorimotor simulation during the processing of local BM cues and a selective compensation based on global configuration cues for the permanent loss of sensorimotor simulation. These findings highlight the role of embodied cognition in the distributed processing of biological motion and suggest the importance of selective compensation under damaged sensorimotor circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40329094What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.