Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329089›Full record

ArticleAmbio2025

Of ponds and people: Governance to balance biodiversity conservation and carp pond farming in Central Europe.

Kathleen Schwerdtner Máñez, Irene Ring, Rosa Hildebrandt, Uwe Brämick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathleen Schwerdtner MáñezInternational Institute Zittau, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Markt 23, 02763, Zittau, Germany. ksmanez@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-4117
Irene RingInternational Institute Zittau, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Markt 23, 02763, Zittau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-8947
Rosa HildebrandtInternational Institute Zittau, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Markt 23, 02763, Zittau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8796-5731
Uwe BrämickInstitut für Binnenfischerei Potsdam-Sacrow, Im Königswald 2, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-5104

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 16LW0084KBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 16LW0085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the loss of many natural water bodies, artificially created ponds often serve as refuge for numerous endangered species. The history of pondscapes in Central Europe is closely tied to the introduction of the common carp. Changing political, social, and climatic conditions, along with the increasing threat from fish-eating species, make the economic viability of pond aquaculture increasingly fragile. However, maintaining these pondscapes is crucial to meet societal demands for landscape and nature conservation. This article addresses the neglect of pondscapes in conservation literature and contributes to the ongoing discussion on the importance of cultural landscapes for biodiversity conservation. Lusatia, one of Europe's largest pondscapes, faces challenges that reflect those encountered in other European pondscapes. In this study, we present these challenges along with the governance approaches implemented in Lusatia, using this analysis to outline potential solutions for conserving European pondscapes more broadly.

Indexed as

AquacultureBiodiversityCarpsConservation of Natural ResourcesPondsAnimalsEndangered SpeciesEuropeHumansBiodiversity governanceCarpCultural landscapesEnvironmental policy instrumentsPond aquaculture

Identifiers

PMID40329089
PMCPMC12480271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.