Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40329046›Full record

SynthesisTargeted oncology2025

Efficacy of First-Line Treatments for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Objective Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival.

Manuela Schmidinger, Pratik P Rane, Kevin Yan, Eric Druyts, Joseph Burgents, Murali Sundaram, Avivit Peer

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Targeted oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manuela SchmidingerDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Care Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pratik P RaneMerck & Co., Inc., 351 N Sumneytown Pike, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA. pratik.rane@merck.com.
Kevin YanPharmalytics Group, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Eric DruytsPharmalytics Group, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Joseph BurgentsMerck & Co., Inc., 351 N Sumneytown Pike, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA.
Murali SundaramMerck & Co., Inc., 351 N Sumneytown Pike, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA.
Avivit PeerRambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to indirectly compare pembrolizumab + lenvatinib to other treatments of interest for first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).

methodsA systematic literature review searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases for relevant randomized controlled trials of interest up to 30 January 2024, with an updated search conducted on 17 March 2025. A fixed effect Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to determine the relative treatment effects for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).

resultsWhen comparing against other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), a statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated between pembrolizumab + lenvatinib compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.53; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.40-0.71), avelumab + axitinib (HR = 0.71; 95% Crl: 0.53-0.94), atezolizumab + bevacizumab (HR = 0.54; 95% CrI: 0.40-0.73), and pembrolizumab + axitinib (HR = 0.69; 95% CrI: 0.51-0.91). Treatment with pembrolizumab + lenvatinib resulted in no statistically significant difference between pembrolizumab + lenvatinib and other combination ICI-based therapies for OS. A statistically significant higher ORR was shown for pembrolizumab + lenvatinib compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (odd ratio (OR) = 3.29; 95% Crl: 2.21-4.93), pembrolizumab + axitinib (OR = 1.92; 95% CrI: 1.27-2.94), atezolizumab + bevacizumab (OR = 4.05; 95% Crl: 2.71-6.05), bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab (OR = 6.20; 95% CrI: 3.69-10.48), and nivolumab (OR = 5.92; 95% CrI: 2.70-13.24).

conclusionsThe overall population analysis indicated that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib improves PFS and ORR compared with other approved ICI combination therapies in first-line aRCC. No significant differences in OS were observed between pembrolizumab + lenvatinib and other combination immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsBayes TheoremHumansProgression-Free Survival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.