ArticleCommunications biology2025
Functional role of cell classes in monkey prefrontal cortex after learning a working memory task.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular Spike Waveforms: Morphology, Biophysics, and Classification Strategies.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Review
- A Comb-Shaped Flexible Microelectrode Array for Simultaneous Multi-Scale Cortical Recording.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is important for learning and performing working memory tasks. However, its precise role for spatial and non-spatial working memory, and the role of different cell types in the circuits that maintain working memory remain poorly understood. To investigate this issue, we analyzed single-unit recordings from the PFC of monkeys during the passive viewing phase before they learned the task rules and after learning, during the execution of active working memory tasks (spatial and feature). Through cluster analysis of extracellular spike waveform features, we identified two classes of narrow-spiking neurons (putative inhibitory cells) and two classes of broad-spiking neurons (putative pyramidal cells). These putative cell classes exhibited distinct physiological characteristics, including baseline firing rates, baseline neural firing variability, and visual stimulus-evoked responses. Neuronal response modulation varied heterogeneously across these cell classes after training and performing active tasks. Training and execution of spatial working memory resulted in higher activity in all class types, highlighting the involvement of diverse prefrontal circuits in spatial information processing. In contrast, feature working memory training and execution affected activity of broad-spiking cell classes alone, suggesting less involvement of a prefrontal circuit in the representation of feature information. We also revealed hitherto unknown, differential effects of training and task execution on different broad-spiking cell types. One broad-spiking neuron subtype exhibited significant response modulation, with increased baseline firing rate, stimulus-evoked responses, and working memory-related firing rates. Another broad-spiking subtype showed decreased baseline firing rate and variability, which may optimize neural coding efficiency. This study advances our understanding of the functional heterogeneity within the PFC and the specialized contributions of different neuronal subtypes to cognitive processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.