ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a biodegradable and eco-friendly novel printing composite using biomaterials on textile substrate and assessing the characterization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of biomaterials has grown in interest over the past few years for their unique properties and diverse applications. The textile printing industry is one of the appropriate sectors to introduce biomaterials that can replace synthetic printing ingredients and reduce environmental threats. In this research, a novel textile printing process was developed using a combination of eco-friendly printing ingredients and later applied with screen printing technology on different textile substrates such as cotton, poly-cotton (65% polyester and 35% cotton), and linen. To evaluate the performance of different printed fabrics, spectrophotometric and color fastness properties were assessed and compared against the conventionally printed control samples. The CIE L*a*b* values showed a slight difference in color intensity between conventional and sustainable printing. For non-washed samples, a prominent fastness result of the highest rating was observed for sustainable-printed specimens. The results were also consistent with the number of washings, as 10 times washed samples also showed comparatively better results in the fastness property and color staining. This eco-friendly printing can replace detrimental synthetic ingredients without compromising the environment, performance, or effectiveness and sustainable printing is a potentially feasible and suitable alternative to conventional printing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.