ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating mining district data into ecological security pattern identification: a case study of Chenzhou.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resource-intensive cities face significant ecological challenges due to mining activities, which degrade landscapes, pollute ecosystems, and disrupt ecological security patterns. This study proposes a process for identifying ecological security patterns (ESP) in mining cities, integrating landscape risk assessment, remote sensing ecological quality evaluation, and mining district spatial data. We introduce the ecological source index (ECSI) to identify ecological sources in Chenzhou and construct an ecological resistance surface (ERS) by incorporating mining district locations. Using circuit theory, we map key ecological corridors and nodes, establishing the ecological security framework for Chenzhou. Our findings show 2,903 km² of primary ecological sources, 1,735 km² of secondary ES, and 2,124 km² of tertiary ES, along with 90 ecological corridors (1,183.66 km), 22 inactive corridors (983.37 km), 3 major river corridors, 68 pinch points, and 80 barriers. The ecological sources are organized in a "dominant source with multiple subsidiary cores" structure, connected by a "three horizontal and four vertical" corridor network. Ecological sources are primarily located in the east, while corridors, pinch points, and barriers are concentrated in the west. Barriers are mainly urban areas, mining zones, and farmland, while pinch points occur in narrow corridor sections, especially near towns and mining areas. Mining activities cause localized shifts and fragmentation of ecological corridors. We propose recommendations for mining management, such as implementing strict mining approval processes, constructing artificial ecological corridors, and expanding ecological channel boundaries in pinch point clusters. These findings provide essential guidance for ecological restoration and sustainable development in resource-dependent cities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.