Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40328890›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2025

Leveraging pretrained deep protein language model to predict peptide collision cross section.

Ayano Nakai-Kasai, Kosuke Ogata, Yasushi Ishihama, Toshiyuki Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Carafe2 enables high qualitybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ayano Nakai-KasaiGraduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8555, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0832-0423
Kosuke OgataDepartment of Molecular Systems Bioanalysis, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0634-3990
Yasushi IshihamaDepartment of Molecular Systems Bioanalysis, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. yishiham@pharm.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7714-203X
Toshiyuki TanakaGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. tt@i.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-9119

Funding

MEXT | JST | Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) JPMJCR1862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collision cross section (CCS) of peptide ions provides an important separation dimension in liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics that incorporates ion mobility spectrometry (IMS), and its accurate prediction is the basis for advanced proteomics workflows. This paper describes experimental data and a prediction model for challenging CCS prediction tasks including longer peptides that tend to have higher charge states. The proposed model is based on a pretrained deep protein language model. While the conventional prediction model requires training from scratch, the proposed model enables training with less amount of time owing to the use of the pretrained model as a feature extractor. Results of experiments with the novel experimental data show that the proposed model succeeds in drastically reducing the training time while maintaining the same or even better prediction performance compared with the conventional method. Our approach presents the possibility of prediction on the basis of "greener" manner training of various peptide properties in proteomic liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry experiments.

Identifiers

PMID40328890
PMCPMC12056190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.