ArticleScientific reports2025
Grip strength as a surrogate measure of strength, functional, and metabolic parameter increases in breast cancer survivors undergoing an exercise regimen.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grip strength, a surrogate for quantifying strength, correlates with function and longevity. However, this relationship is less clear in women with breast cancer. 138 women undergoing oncologic treatment for breast cancer were enrolled across three institutional review board-approved protocols with three months of resistance training with pre and post assessment of body composition, phase angle, functional movement screen (FMS), balance, weight lifted (load), quality of life, activity levels, and hand grip strength. Significant increases in maximum, minimum, and mean grip strength were seen. Mean grip strength increased by 12.6% and 3.5 kg. Right/left (R/L) mismatch significantly decreased from baseline to post-intervention (13.3 to 8.7%). On univariable analysis, greater baseline mean grip strength was associated with younger age, greater baseline FMS, composite load lifted, activity levels, and decreased R/L balance mismatch. On multivariable analysis, greater mean grip strength was independently associated with greater baseline mobility and composite load lifted. Baseline mean grip strength was associated with baseline lower bodyfat percentage and greater muscle mass, whole body phase angle, and resting metabolic rate (all significant on multivariable analysis, R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.