Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40328846›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A CAS driven framework integrating entropy cloud and fuzzy cognitive map enhances disaster resilience in urban old communities.

Weijing Liang, Ye Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weijing LiangCollege of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030024, China. liangweijing99@163.com.
Ye XueCollege of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030024, China.

Funding

2021 Hebei Province Social Science Foundation Program HB21SH019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing risks from both natural and human-made disasters, exacerbated by the dense concentration of urban populations and assets, pose serious challenges for disaster prevention and response. These challenges are especially acute in urban old communities, which often lack sufficient resistance and adaptive capacity. This study focuses on urban old communities and, drawing on Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theory and the concept of community resilience, explores the resource systems that support resilience enhancement. A disaster resilience evaluation index system is developed, and the entropy-weight method combined with the cloud model is used to assess the current level of resilience. Key factors influencing resilience are identified, and a fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) model is applied to simulate their dynamic interactions and mechanisms of influence. The results indicate that low disaster resilience in urban old communities stems primarily from aging infrastructure, weak ecological systems, imbalanced population structures, economic instability, insufficient organizational capacity, and limited cultural awareness. Among these, the resilience of infrastructure and cultural awareness emerge as the most critical factors, representing key pathways for resilience enhancement. Based on these findings, the study proposes targeted resilience enhancement strategies. In resource-constrained environments, a phased and prioritized approach is recommended, focusing on strengthening infrastructure, improving ecological conditions, optimizing population composition, enhancing economic stability, reinforcing organizational systems, and promoting cultural awareness. These measures aim to systematically improve disaster resilience in urban old communities and provide a solid foundation for community-level disaster preparedness and response.

Indexed as

Complex adaptive systemsDisaster resilienceEntropy-weight method-cloud modelFuzzy cognitive mapUrban old communities

Identifiers

PMID40328846
PMCPMC12056038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.