Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40328844›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Dynamic cross-domain transfer learning for driver fatigue monitoring: multi-modal sensor fusion with adaptive real-time personalizations.

S S Aravinth, G Muni Nagamani, Chanumolu Kiran Kumar, Ayodele Lasisi, Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed, A Bhowmik, Wahaj Ahmad Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S S AravinthDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, 522502, India.
G Muni NagamaniDepartment of computer science & engineering, Andhra Loyola Institute of Engineering and Technology, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, 520008, India. dr.muninagamani@gmail.com.
Chanumolu Kiran KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, 522502, India.
Ayodele LasisiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Quadri Noorulhasan NaveedDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
A BhowmikCentre for Research Impact & Outcome, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, 140401, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Wahaj Ahmad KhanInstitute of Technology, Dire-Dawa University, 1487, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. wkhan9450@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driver fatigue is one of the most common causes of road accidents, which means that there is a great need for robust and adaptive monitoring systems. Current models of fatigue detection suffer from domain-specific limitations in generalizing across diverse environments, sensor variability, and individual differences. Moreover, they are not resilient to real-time sensor quality issues or missing data, which limits their practical applicability. To overcome the aforementioned challenges, we propose a holistic Dynamic Cross-Domain Transfer Learning framework for fatigue monitoring application using multi-modal sensor data fusion. There are four innovations involved with this framework. Firstly, the domain adversarial neural network in EEG, ECG, and video inputs ensures cross-domain invariance of features. The gap of adaptation at the domain goes below 5%, while there is an improvement of the cross-domain accuracy to as high as 15% from 10%. The ASF-Transformer uses adaptive cross-modal attention for fusing heterogeneous sensor data effectively. Accuracy improves by 5-8% and remains robust under modality dropout conditions. Third, the GMSN dynamically evaluates sensor quality and selectively enables modalities to mitigate performance drops to < 5% even with noisy or missing inputs in process. Fourth, Online Personalized Fine-Tuning (OPFT) allows for real-time adaptation of the model to individual drivers, achieving an improvement in accuracy by 5-7% within 2 h with a latency of < 50ms. Thorough evaluations show that the framework can achieve 85-90% accuracy on target domains while maintaining robustness under 20% sensor dropout. Addressing the issue of domain variability, sensor quality, and personalization, this work has improved the reliability, adaptability, and real-time feasibility of fatigue monitoring systems to provide significant advancements for driver safety in dynamic real-world environments.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingFatigueMachine LearningAccidents, TrafficAlgorithmsElectrocardiographyElectroencephalographyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerDomain adaptationDriver fatigueMulti-Modal sensor fusionReal-Time personalizationsTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40328844
PMCPMC12056195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.