ArticleScientific reports2025
A high precision YOLO model for surface defect detection based on PyConv and CISBA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MSFE-YOLO: A Steel Surface Defect Detection Algorithm Integrating Multi-Scale Frequency Domain and Defect-Aware Attention.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advanced Sensor Technologies in Cutting Applications: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Defect detection is vital for product quality in industrial production, yet current surface defect detection technologies struggle with diverse defect types and complex backgrounds. The challenge intensifies with multi-scale small targets, leading to significantly reduced detection performance. Therefore, this paper proposes the EPSC-YOLO algorithm to improve the efficiency and accuracy of defect detection. The algorithm first introduces multi-scale attention modules and uses two newly designed pyramid convolutions in the backbone network to better identify multi-scale defects; Secondly, Soft-NMS is introduced to replace traditional NMS, which can reduce information loss and improve multi-target detection accuracy by smoothing and suppressing the scores of overlapping boxes. In addition, a new convolutional attention module, CISBA, is designed to enhance the detection capability of small targets in complex backgrounds. In the end, we validate the effectiveness of EPSC-YOLO on NEU-DET and GC10-DET datasets. The experimental results show that, compared to YOLOv9c, [Formula: see text] increases by 2% and 2.4%, and [Formula: see text] increases by 5.1% and 2.4%, respectively. Meanwhile, EPSC-YOLO demonstrates superior accuracy and significant advantages in real-time detection of surface defects on products compared to algorithms such as YOLOv10 and MSFT-YOLO.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.