Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40328767›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Global risk of wildfire across timber production systems.

Christopher G Bousfield, Oscar Morton, David B Lindenmayer, Adam F A Pellegrini, Matthew G Hethcoat, David P Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher G BousfieldDepartment of Plant Sciences and Centre for Global Wood Security, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. cgb48@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-9779
Oscar MortonDepartment of Plant Sciences and Centre for Global Wood Security, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-4498
David B LindenmayerFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-4088
Adam F A PellegriniDepartment of Plant Sciences and Centre for Global Wood Security, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0418-4129
Matthew G HethcoatCanadian Forest Service, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
David P EdwardsDepartment of Plant Sciences and Centre for Global Wood Security, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8562-3853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timber is worth $1.5 trillion US Dollars annually with demand rising, but wildfires increasingly threaten production. Plantations occupy 3% of forests globally and produce 33% of the world's timber, but a critical question is whether they are more vulnerable to stand-replacing wildfires than natural production forests. We combine forest management and wildfire data to estimate that 15.7 (14.7-16.7) million hectares of natural production forests and 1.4 (1.26-1.64) million hectares of plantations suffered stand-replacing wildfires between 2015 and 2022. Using statistical matching for 17 countries representing 50% of global production and 75% of burned timber-producing forest, we find plantations in temperate regions were twice as likely to suffer stand-replacing wildfires than natural production forests, including in vital timber-producing nations like China and Russia. Plantations in tropical regions showed no clear effect, with national differences ranging from 75% lower to 58% higher risk of burning. Given increasing global reliance on plantation timber, preventing wildfires through landscape-level planning, fire management, and increased plantation diversity is critical for global wood security.

Identifiers

PMID40328767
PMCPMC12056198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.