ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Automated On-the-Fly Optimization of Resource Allocation for Efficient Free Energy Simulations.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fully Automatable Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations with Enhanced Sampling Using FAST/MBAR.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Collaborative Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery Using OpenFE.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- SAMTI: Sampling Adaptive Thermodynamic Integration for Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Automated Adaptive Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computing the free energy of protein-ligand binding by employing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations is becoming a valuable tool in the early stages of drug discovery. However, the cost and complexity of such simulations are often prohibitive for high-throughput studies. We present an automated workflow for the thermodynamic integration scheme with the "on-the-fly" optimization of computational resource allocation for each λ-window of both relative and absolute binding free energy simulations. This iterative workflow utilizes automatic equilibration detection and convergence testing via the Jensen-Shannon distance to determine optimal simulation stopping points in an entirely data-driven manner. It is broadly applicable to multiple free energy calculations, such as ligand binding, amino acid mutations, and others, while utilizing different estimators, e.g., free energy perturbation, BAR, MBAR, etc. We benchmark our workflow on the well-characterized systems, namely, cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and T4 lysozyme L99A/M102Q mutant, and the more flexible SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease. We demonstrate that this proposed protocol can achieve more than 85% reduction in computational expense while maintaining similar levels of accuracy compared to other benchmarking protocols. We examine the performance of this protocol on both small and large molecular transformations. The cost-accuracy tradeoff of repeated runs is also investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.