ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025
Metal-α-Helix Peptide Frameworks.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Weaving two-dimensional peptide crystals.Nature chemistry · 2026Article
- Programming Mn(II) coordination in self-assembling peptides amplifies mtDNA-driven STING signaling for potent antitumor immunity.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Mesoporous peptide frameworks engineered from crystallizable collagen-mimetic peptide amphiphiles.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- α-Helical peptides: design strategies and recent advances in biomedical applications.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- A hydroxyl group dictates handedness, pitch, and mechanics in a crystalline covalent helical polymer.Science advances · 2025Article
- Discrete Actuation of Water-Responsive Crystalline Metal-Peptide Frameworks.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Chemical methods to stabilize segments of metalloproteins in the form of peptides.Methods in enzymology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metal-peptide frameworks (MPFs) are a growing class of metal-organic frameworks with promising applications in metalloprotein mimicry, chiral separations, and catalysis. There are limited examples of MPFs, especially those with both secondary structure and natural amino acid side chains that coordinate to metal nodes, which are important for accurately mimicking metalloprotein active sites. Here, we design a robust and modular strategy based on short α-helical peptides (nine amino acids long) to form frameworks with many types of biomimetic metal sites. Peptides were designed to have Glu and His metal-binding residues, hydrophobic residues, and noncanonical helix-enforcing residues. With Co(II), it was shown that mutagenesis of a single amino acid near the metal-binding residues generates a diverse library of frameworks with varying metal node coordination geometries and compositions. Structures for 16 out of 20 variants were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, revealing how noncovalent interactions impact the metal primary sphere. In one case, a point mutation turns on reversible ligand-triggered conformational changes, demonstrating that this platform allows for dynamic behavior like that observed in metalloproteins. Furthermore, we show that frameworks readily assemble with Mn(II), Fe(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) ions, highlighting the generality of this approach. The ease-of-synthesis, modularity, and crystallinity of these materials make this a highly accessible platform for studying and engineering biomimetic metal centers in porous materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.