ArticleBMJ open2025
Mapping the components of the effective implementation of diabetes prevention programmes after gestational diabetes mellitus: a protocol for a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation Components of Diabetes Prevention Programs after Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review.Current diabetes reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWomen with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have a high lifetime risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Diabetes prevention programmes may reduce this risk. However, challenges related to the successful implementation of diabetes prevention programmes after GDM exist. Our objective is to map the components of the effective implementation of diabetes prevention programmes after GDM. We also plan to connect the available evidence on the effective implementation of diabetes prevention programmes to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a scoping review following Levac's adaptation of Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews. We will report it according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Using a peer-reviewed search strategy, we will search Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Emcare for primary studies describing the effective implementation of diabetes prevention programmes after GDM. Study selection will be completed in DistillerSR by two independent reviewers. Data will be extracted by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer for accuracy using data extraction forms in DistillerSR. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required. Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. STUDY REGISTRATION DETAILS: This scoping review protocol was registered with Open Science Framework (OSF; preregistration, 15 April 2024; registration ID: 10.17605/OSF.IO/MPNQD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.